From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A48BF94E for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 10:51:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Jan 2017 01:51:47 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,249,1477983600"; d="scan'208";a="1114376102" Received: from irsmsx110.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.25]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Jan 2017 01:51:46 -0800 Received: from irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.7.38]) by irsmsx110.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.15.101]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 09:51:46 +0000 From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" To: Thomas Monjalon , Michal Miroslaw CC: "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] acl: remove invalid test Thread-Index: AQHSVi7iuYM9V+6wvkipwF3p7exsIqEPpGmAgAUsXgCAAIJP8IAnrBmAgAE0ITA= Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 09:51:45 +0000 Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772583F107553@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20161223014752.wicbgkvlotllsfc6@rere.qmqm.pl> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772583F0F876A@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> <1502594.BWgYCgn4M3@xps13> In-Reply-To: <1502594.BWgYCgn4M3@xps13> Accept-Language: en-IE, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.181] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] acl: remove invalid test X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 09:51:49 -0000 Hi Thomas, >=20 > 2016-12-23 09:36, Ananyev, Konstantin: > > From: Michal Miroslaw [mailto:mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl] > > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 06:48:52PM +0000, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote: > > > > I suppose that changes have to be inside: > > > > [PATCH v2] acl: allow zero verdict. > > > > > > The 'allow zero verdict' patch depends on this one if we are to not h= ave > > > a breaking tests inbetween. > > > > Exactly, that's why I think they either has to be in one series of patc= hes, > > with this one coming first and ' PATCH v2] acl: allow zero verdict' as = the second one, > > or just merge them into one. >=20 > No progress here. > Konstantin, do you ack this patch? Yes, I do. I just thought that the author would resubmit it as part of=20 ' PATCH v2] acl: allow zero verdict' to comply with DPDK patch submission rules. Konstantin > I could apply it as a standalone patch.