DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: "Legacy, Allain (Wind River)" <allain.legacy@windriver.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] ip_frag: handle MTU sizes not aligned to 8 bytes
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 16:55:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772583FB058D0@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1489504487-67456-1-git-send-email-allain.legacy@windriver.com>



> 
> The rte_ipv4_fragment_packet API expects that the link/interface MTU value
> passed in be divisible by 8 bytes.  Given the name of the parameter is
> "mtu" rather than "frag_size" it is not necessarily the case that it will
> be divisible by 8.  An MTU of 1500 happens to produce a max fragment size
> of 1480 (1500 - sizeof(ipv4_hdr)) which is divisible by 8 but other MTU
> values such as 1600 or 9000 do not produce values that are divisible by 8.
> 
> Unfortunately, the API checks that the frag_size value produced is
> divisible by 8 with a call to RTE_ASSERT which is only enabled when the
> RTE_LOG_LEVEL >= RTE_LOG_DEBUG.  In cases where the log level is set
> normally the code silently continues and produces IP fragments that have
> invalid fragment offset values.
> 
> An application may not have control over what MTU a user selects and rather
> than have each application adjust the MTU to pass a suitable value to the
> fragmentation API this change modifies the fragmentation API to handle
> cases where the "mtu" argument is not divisible by 8 and automatically
> adjust the internal "frag_size".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Allain Legacy <allain.legacy@windriver.com>
> ---

Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>



  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-04 16:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-14 15:14 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Allain Legacy
2017-06-04 16:55 ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2017-06-22 16:00   ` [dpdk-dev] " Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772583FB058D0@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=allain.legacy@windriver.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).