From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83EB537B1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu,  5 Oct 2017 14:12:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32])
 by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Oct 2017 05:12:32 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,481,1500966000"; d="scan'208";a="159177256"
Received: from irsmsx154.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.192.96])
 by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Oct 2017 05:12:30 -0700
Received: from irsmsx103.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.49]) by
 IRSMSX154.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.12.83]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002;
 Thu, 5 Oct 2017 13:12:29 +0100
From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: "Li, Xiaoyun" <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>, "Richardson, Bruce"
 <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
CC: "Lu, Wenzhuo" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>, "Zhang, Helin"
 <helin.zhang@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "Thomas Monjalon
 (thomas.monjalon@6wind.com)" <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Thread-Topic: [PATCH v6 1/3] eal/x86: run-time dispatch over memcpy
Thread-Index: AQHTPWSWiZTYPKjCEUOOKgXPK7gEoKLU/5gAgAAMagCAAAIbAIAAHQKQ
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 12:12:29 +0000
Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772585FAA49D2@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <1507042796-86318-1-git-send-email-xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
 <1507157911-8702-1-git-send-email-xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
 <1507157911-8702-2-git-send-email-xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
 <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772585FAA48BC@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <B9E724F4CB7543449049E7AE7669D82F464737@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <B9E724F4CB7543449049E7AE7669D82F4647C4@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <B9E724F4CB7543449049E7AE7669D82F4647C4@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Accept-Language: en-IE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiZjc0MGFlOTMtZTdkNi00ZGEzLWI5ODAtNzc3OGQ0YmQ4MmU3IiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE2LjUuOS4zIiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6IjRuQklGa2ZoblBCTllvNnV2K0I5Y0lwSWlFU0VvZ3UxMkY3WnN5d2ZWaTQ9In0=
x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 11.0.0.116
dlp-reaction: no-action
x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.181]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/3] eal/x86: run-time dispatch over memcpy
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 12:12:35 -0000



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Li, Xiaoyun
> Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2017 12:27 PM
> To: Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.a=
nanyev@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce
> <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; Zhang, Helin <helin.zhang@intel.c=
om>; dev@dpdk.org; Thomas Monjalon
> (thomas.monjalon@6wind.com) <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 1/3] eal/x86: run-time dispatch over memcpy
>=20
> Another thing, if add 17.11, the end is 17.08 or EXPERIMENTAL?

I don't see why to go experimental here - you are not adding new API,
Just a rework of existing one (rte_memcpy()) and rte_memcpy_ptr is exposed
Just for performance reasons.
So my vote would be for 17.11.
Konstantin=20

>=20
> Best Regards,
> Xiaoyun Li
>=20
>=20
>=20
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Li, Xiaoyun
> > Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2017 19:19
> > To: Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>; Richardson,
> > Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> > Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; Zhang, Helin
> > <helin.zhang@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Thomas Monjalon
> > (thomas.monjalon@6wind.com) <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/3] eal/x86: run-time dispatch over
> > memcpy
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> > > Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2017 17:37
> > > To: Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce
> > > <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; Zhang, Helin
> > > <helin.zhang@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Thomas Monjalon
> > > (thomas.monjalon@6wind.com) <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
> > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 1/3] eal/x86: run-time dispatch over memcpy
> > >
> > > > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map
> > > > b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map
> > > > index 8c08b8d..15a2fe9 100644
> > > > --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map
> > > > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map
> > > > @@ -241,5 +241,6 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
> > > >  	rte_service_runstate_set;
> > > >  	rte_service_set_stats_enable;
> > > >  	rte_service_start_with_defaults;
> > > > +	rte_memcpy_ptr;
> > > >
> > > >  } DPDK_17.08;
> > >
> > > I am not an expert in DPDK versioning system, But shouldn't we create
> > > a
> > > 17.11 section here?
> > Should we create a 17.11 section? I am not sure who to ask for.
> >
> > > Also I think an alphabetical order should be preserved here.
> > OK.
> >
> > > Konstantin