From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>,
"Lu, Wenzhuo" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
"Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: make txonly mode generate multiple flows
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 12:21:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725886280145@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180117181846.3565-1-yskoh@mellanox.com>
Hi,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Yongseok Koh
> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 6:19 PM
> To: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; Wu, Jingjing <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: make txonly mode generate multiple flows
>
> Testpmd can generate multiple flows without taking much cost and this could
> be a simple traffic generator for developer's quick tests. IP destination
> address is varied.
Correct me if I am wrong - but that the change of existing behavior.
Without any announcement and without ability to the user to keep
current one (command-line option, new CLI command, etc.).
What if there are people who rely on existing behavior
(some test scripts or so)?
Konstantin
>
> Signed-off-by: Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>
> ---
>
> v2:
> * Add detailed explanation in a comment.
>
> app/test-pmd/txonly.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/txonly.c b/app/test-pmd/txonly.c
> index 1f08b6ed3..253cf2385 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/txonly.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/txonly.c
> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
> #define UDP_DST_PORT 1024
>
> #define IP_SRC_ADDR ((192U << 24) | (168 << 16) | (0 << 8) | 1)
> -#define IP_DST_ADDR ((192U << 24) | (168 << 16) | (0 << 8) | 2)
> +#define IP_DST_ADDR ((192U << 24) | (168 << 16))
>
> #define IP_DEFTTL 64 /* from RFC 1340. */
> #define IP_VERSION 0x40
> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@
> #define IP_VHL_DEF (IP_VERSION | IP_HDRLEN)
>
> static struct ipv4_hdr pkt_ip_hdr; /**< IP header of transmitted packets. */
> +static __thread uint8_t ip_var; /**< IP address variation */
> static struct udp_hdr pkt_udp_hdr; /**< UDP header of transmitted packets. */
>
> static void
> @@ -159,6 +160,7 @@ pkt_burst_transmit(struct fwd_stream *fs)
> struct rte_mbuf *pkt_seg;
> struct rte_mempool *mbp;
> struct ether_hdr eth_hdr;
> + struct ipv4_hdr *ip_hdr;
> uint16_t nb_tx;
> uint16_t nb_pkt;
> uint16_t vlan_tci, vlan_tci_outer;
> @@ -237,6 +239,17 @@ pkt_burst_transmit(struct fwd_stream *fs)
> copy_buf_to_pkt(ð_hdr, sizeof(eth_hdr), pkt, 0);
> copy_buf_to_pkt(&pkt_ip_hdr, sizeof(pkt_ip_hdr), pkt,
> sizeof(struct ether_hdr));
> + ip_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(pkt, struct ipv4_hdr *,
> + sizeof(struct ether_hdr));
> + /*
> + * Generate multiple flows by varying IP dest addr. This enables
> + * packets are well distributed by RSS in receiver side if any
> + * and txonly mode can be a decent packet generator for
> + * developer's quick performance regression test.
> + */
> + ip_hdr->dst_addr =
> + rte_cpu_to_be_32(IP_DST_ADDR | (ip_var++ << 8) |
> + (rte_lcore_id() + 1));
> copy_buf_to_pkt(&pkt_udp_hdr, sizeof(pkt_udp_hdr), pkt,
> sizeof(struct ether_hdr) +
> sizeof(struct ipv4_hdr));
> --
> 2.11.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-18 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-15 21:11 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Yongseok Koh
2018-01-12 18:08 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-16 2:40 ` Lu, Wenzhuo
2018-01-17 18:04 ` Yongseok Koh
2018-01-17 18:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Yongseok Koh
2018-01-18 1:22 ` Lu, Wenzhuo
2018-01-18 12:21 ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2018-01-19 7:09 ` Yongseok Koh
2018-01-19 11:02 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-01-18 13:55 ` Jerin Jacob
2019-03-28 1:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Yongseok Koh
2019-03-28 1:51 ` Yongseok Koh
2019-03-28 10:24 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-03-28 10:24 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-03-28 17:33 ` Yongseok Koh
2019-03-28 17:33 ` Yongseok Koh
2019-03-28 17:42 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-03-28 17:42 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-03-28 18:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Yongseok Koh
2019-03-28 18:46 ` Yongseok Koh
2019-03-29 9:55 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-03-29 9:55 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-03-29 18:44 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-03-29 18:44 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725886280145@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
--cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
--cc=yskoh@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).