From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com (mail-wi0-f176.google.com [209.85.212.176]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B57B75A45 for ; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 11:22:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wibhh20 with SMTP id hh20so114364797wib.0 for ; Sun, 09 Aug 2015 02:22:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=Da5Y0wieUWCsMQzp3zYZ7jCBkQ452qQDVfRpDs691YM=; b=E7JVqMrDTqMf6S3WmatI3oyzYl4Q22ULxW3KhzLXgjANgKmbP3sUW+M9fsKPqsKGMo glRLfKHl+uvWjDaHcND3u6wYzRljmnADF6adX4PfSoUFN0QqcpBZhuVRI8baGzi0wbUi fiYTFQRwacjGlb0VmtbFKxvk+m8kNPv3Qn71mj6ssibbuNH65olNHbhYm8caOk9Ed8kY wTQYeFwPm3oNwoDHqK9QAxIcx6xD2BakMl1Kx/3b2vBvePn1IpcHajoPxr850tMZGZmu b0/rx3VdwM6s7oiCT/fQviiLq9lVzcxnZ9UoDs/KGfx9QKtERSOtfx4BHYRThoApQtS9 yDXg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmtho0GtN60zXWBwD9TqG/p3qm8O0q+qSqkZXEf63CvlwGAOM7rBdSCFH04WmnGQHps4Kny X-Received: by 10.194.237.232 with SMTP id vf8mr33314189wjc.22.1439112138595; Sun, 09 Aug 2015 02:22:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ub19sm7779542wib.8.2015.08.09.02.22.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 09 Aug 2015 02:22:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ravi Kerur Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2015 11:21:04 +0200 Message-ID: <2618969.8Z8RK36gE9@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.8 (Linux/4.0.4-2-ARCH; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1438884241-15599-1-git-send-email-rkerur@gmail.com> <55C41735.1030405@igel.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] Change rte_eal_vdev_init to update port_id X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2015 09:22:18 -0000 2015-08-07 15:06, Ravi Kerur: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 7:25 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote: > > On 2015/08/07 3:04, Ravi Kerur wrote: > > Hi Thomas, > > > > Could you please make sure API consistency? > > Is it ok to add above functions to DPDK_2.1 even though we are in RC > > phase, or need to add to DPDK_2.2? > > > Same question. If it's targeted for 2.2 then I will modify this. Why should it be in 2.1? Is there something I missed which makes it an important fix? If no, please stop sending this kind of patch until the end of the 2.1 release. Thanks