From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6F37A0544; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 12:52:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54392406B4; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 12:52:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C6D4021D; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 12:52:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97D132009A5; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 06:52:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 07 Jun 2022 06:52:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1654599156; x= 1654685556; bh=1wJsTijNO2voVRn5Ft5sPqJL+o+OHw+ZVvBUGi8pYVc=; b=X WUFawwR6sPpN3SFdbl53h28/wlJdMc8qz4Y5jpAJdkUFQ/62+nmPUE0/EMJx+OAY sKAcgP5su8/I8cI1q/igPpBtBEnxLjUKAHjQN+MaqV8TAX8htrRF7WLBO6Oe93Kh BXGT+EktQvOacL96yyurGOiZSx2eNTrWVlV2OYZgPCBVTNM2jCWqds4YxC7vztOU KisKWdXHL0T/RBTRw8Skla0qOZ1mED7xQwX0JG732jkRr1kH8W4wFjnYUtcVBJoI afpbHdUhEUHjS/wyEdBUCA6VyIhjvXeWMtjA5eDCPdaUYyzl8kkhT9JcZx3YbBnP APaTih9U8FBnwPJrNYocw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1654599156; x= 1654685556; bh=1wJsTijNO2voVRn5Ft5sPqJL+o+OHw+ZVvBUGi8pYVc=; b=v h3tcrQ7RJcsn0FVnBdXRzTyj1XYHpiPCEa4p7qzUcREy7d1vGqvce+ClZrtKUt0s OmrY4LEqG7VhCVbs1bJ76b+tQRnHFFKHEhtLfO3LaCW8IuGHPFzonYYtDqnzbfho i/oyjtuPc1325GDHeSnGhjpC0M35nwX8opLuIA5D2Xb8TiixmEhMZR6R/3PdPIlC UjHj3Ts6yGoXFq3xD1zp2pEFVysW67L+7mn+g0KqAS96UPGNT72zlznTq3kaTMo1 F7aYTgUYlIidFC9tg6Ct+urzwwn1FJx8Q/5xrY+lEdC6XzfCo5WuBJIdZ4+3+6Ed eg+N0UBHZF8UG/ssyd00w== X-ME-Sender: <xms:9C2fYlArTWrbwAbyVmwov3J6EiVaH7up-dUfiJTpUMsV3oY1CWnzUg> <xme:9C2fYjhtey2llYPubVZDa0tfsmluGpzRFGjI0X9XrWddPZR3w7MhPCKJvdd_FYU0y 4hWhUwmxSBpO4QOIQ> X-ME-Received: <xmr:9C2fYgkprnhDZDGyPTq2krZDMW6XFfkr3_WInHuZ1LZKVcms4C5LS0qq4qnUSqfdW-QWAkTmyvKFzryZ5jUeTJ9YJw> X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedruddthedgfedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvfevufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtuf ertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghs sehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnheptdejieeifeehtdffgf dvleetueeffeehueejgfeuteeftddtieekgfekudehtdfgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihii vgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonh drnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:9C2fYvz6NMJE6zvLfG00eOQaGQHRLMzo_cZdTDJmzjSbTMpliRUsIA> <xmx:9C2fYqQJoW6JNSgz1UqVIpiR-m661SPN3c93iuBRW4yyCiO93qPXmA> <xmx:9C2fYiYPUWXcA5EEJHUzXdHeKaKMQ5xyLtpYUUgm9jIhybaPdiO6Qg> <xmx:9C2fYofzARg_AK_jPza9WV28wE9yfjD5mOkzvN6gCB6lIgCky4Fk5Q> Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 06:52:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> To: Wenxuan Wu <wenxuanx.wu@intel.com> Cc: bruce.richardson@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] build: fix meson build when gcc >= 10.0 Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2022 12:52:32 +0200 Message-ID: <26640576.6Emhk5qWAg@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20220607025652.1114683-1-wenxuanx.wu@intel.com> References: <20220607025652.1114683-1-wenxuanx.wu@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 07/06/2022 04:56, wenxuanx.wu@intel.com: > From: Wenxuan Wu <wenxuanx.wu@intel.com> > > GCC version greater than 10.0, with compile option -O2, several warnings info would appear, > this fix omitted these warnings. [...] > # FIXME: Bugzilla 396 > - warning_flags += '-Wno-zero-length-bounds' > + warning_flags += [ > + '-Wno-zero-length-bounds', > + '-Wno-stringop-overflow', > + '-Wno-array-bounds', > + '-Wno-format-overflow', The compilers are reported warnings to help us having a better code. We should try to resolve the warnings, not hiding them.