Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] eal / bonding pmd cleanup

[Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>]

> > >> This patchset reworks the bonding pmd so that we don't need to modify the
> > >> eal
> > >> for this pmd to work.
> > >>
> > >> Basically, the arguments parsed at bond_init are stored in the bond
> > >> private
> > >> structure to be used at dev_configure time.
> > >> If no argument are present, we suppose that the bonding api has been
> > >> called.
> > >>
> > >
> > > I did not get any comment on these patches.
> > > Anyone ?
> > >
> > > The idea here is to keep pmd stuff in the pmds and avoid polluting the eal.
> > 
> > ping
> 
> Sorry, it was on my todo list and it kept getting pushed back.  I like the
> change, its makes great sense and does proper isolation of the PMD.
> 
> Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>

Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>

Applied.
Patches 2 and 3 were merged since 2 is a revert and 3 is a partial revert
of the revert ;)

This patchset prove that my initial request was not so complex :)
(http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-June/003833.html)

Thanks
-- 
Thomas