DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dekel Peled <dekelp@mellanox.com>
To: matan@mellanox.com, viacheslavo@mellanox.com
Cc: rasland@mellanox.com, orika@mellanox.com, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 05/11] net/mlx5: unify validation of drop action
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 16:27:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <26679816cc524d1b5665fc79ba48b89b37d85dd7.1579703134.git.dekelp@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1579703134.git.dekelp@mellanox.com>

According to PRM: "Drop action is mutually-exclusive with any other
action, except for Count action".
In current code this limitaion is checked separately in validation
function of each action.

This patch removes the discrete checks, and adds a single check common
for all actions.

Signed-off-by: Dekel Peled <dekelp@mellanox.com>
Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>
---
 drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.c       | 25 +------------------------
 drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c    | 36 ++++++++++++------------------------
 drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_verbs.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.c
index 970123b..7738cb2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.c
@@ -905,11 +905,6 @@ uint32_t mlx5_flow_adjust_priority(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, int32_t priority,
 			       const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
 			       struct rte_flow_error *error)
 {
-
-	if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DROP)
-		return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
-					  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL,
-					  "can't drop and flag in same flow");
 	if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_MARK)
 		return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
 					  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL,
@@ -961,10 +956,6 @@ uint32_t mlx5_flow_adjust_priority(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, int32_t priority,
 					  &mark->id,
 					  "mark id must in 0 <= id < "
 					  RTE_STR(MLX5_FLOW_MARK_MAX));
-	if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DROP)
-		return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
-					  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL,
-					  "can't drop and mark in same flow");
 	if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_FLAG)
 		return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
 					  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL,
@@ -996,24 +987,10 @@ uint32_t mlx5_flow_adjust_priority(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, int32_t priority,
  *   0 on success, a negative errno value otherwise and rte_errno is set.
  */
 int
-mlx5_flow_validate_action_drop(uint64_t action_flags,
+mlx5_flow_validate_action_drop(uint64_t action_flags __rte_unused,
 			       const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
 			       struct rte_flow_error *error)
 {
-	if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_FLAG)
-		return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
-					  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL,
-					  "can't drop and flag in same flow");
-	if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_MARK)
-		return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
-					  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL,
-					  "can't drop and mark in same flow");
-	if (action_flags & (MLX5_FLOW_FATE_ACTIONS |
-			    MLX5_FLOW_FATE_ESWITCH_ACTIONS))
-		return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
-					  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL,
-					  "can't have 2 fate actions in"
-					  " same flow");
 	if (attr->egress)
 		return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
 					  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ATTR_EGRESS, NULL,
diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
index 59ece01..b0d5688 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
@@ -1912,10 +1912,6 @@ struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = {
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 	assert(ret > 0);
-	if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DROP)
-		return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
-					  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL,
-					  "can't drop and flag in same flow");
 	if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_MARK)
 		return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
 					  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL,
@@ -1985,10 +1981,6 @@ struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = {
 					  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION_CONF,
 					  &mark->id,
 					  "mark id exceeds the limit");
-	if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DROP)
-		return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
-					  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL,
-					  "can't drop and mark in same flow");
 	if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_FLAG)
 		return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
 					  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL,
@@ -2173,10 +2165,6 @@ struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = {
 		return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
 					  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, action,
 					  "configuration cannot be null");
-	if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DROP)
-		return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
-					  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL,
-					  "can't drop and encap in same flow");
 	if (action_flags & (MLX5_FLOW_ENCAP_ACTIONS | MLX5_FLOW_DECAP_ACTIONS))
 		return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
 					  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL,
@@ -2209,10 +2197,6 @@ struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = {
 				 const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
 				 struct rte_flow_error *error)
 {
-	if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DROP)
-		return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
-					  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL,
-					  "can't drop and decap in same flow");
 	if (action_flags & (MLX5_FLOW_ENCAP_ACTIONS | MLX5_FLOW_DECAP_ACTIONS))
 		return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
 					  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL,
@@ -2259,10 +2243,6 @@ struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = {
 		return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
 					  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, action,
 					  "configuration cannot be null");
-	if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DROP)
-		return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
-					  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL,
-					  "can't drop and encap in same flow");
 	if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ENCAP_ACTIONS)
 		return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
 					  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL,
@@ -2306,10 +2286,6 @@ struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = {
 {
 	const struct rte_flow_action_raw_decap *decap	= action->conf;
 
-	if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DROP)
-		return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
-					  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL,
-					  "can't drop and decap in same flow");
 	if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ENCAP_ACTIONS)
 		return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
 					  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL,
@@ -5051,6 +5027,18 @@ struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = {
 						  "action not supported");
 		}
 	}
+	/*
+	 * Validate the drop action mutual exclusion with other actions.
+	 * Drop action is mutually-exclusive with any other action, except for
+	 * Count action.
+	 */
+	if ((action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DROP) &&
+	    (action_flags & ~(MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DROP | MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_COUNT)))
+		return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
+					  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL,
+					  "Drop action is mutually-exclusive "
+					  "with any other action, except for "
+					  "Count action");
 	/* Eswitch has few restrictions on using items and actions */
 	if (attr->transfer) {
 		if (!mlx5_flow_ext_mreg_supported(dev) &&
diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_verbs.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_verbs.c
index c787c98..72fb1e4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_verbs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_verbs.c
@@ -1255,6 +1255,18 @@
 						  "action not supported");
 		}
 	}
+	/*
+	 * Validate the drop action mutual exclusion with other actions.
+	 * Drop action is mutually-exclusive with any other action, except for
+	 * Count action.
+	 */
+	if ((action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DROP) &&
+	    (action_flags & ~(MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DROP | MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_COUNT)))
+		return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
+					  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL,
+					  "Drop action is mutually-exclusive "
+					  "with any other action, except for "
+					  "Count action");
 	if (!(action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_FATE_ACTIONS))
 		return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
 					  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, actions,
-- 
1.8.3.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-01-22 14:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-22 14:27 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/11] net/mlx5: vlan actions validation fixes Dekel Peled
2020-01-22 14:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/11] net/mlx5: fix masks of encap and decap actions Dekel Peled
2020-01-23  7:56   ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-22 14:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 02/11] net/mlx5: fix invalid check for VLAN actions Dekel Peled
2020-01-23  7:56   ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-22 14:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 03/11] net/mlx5: fix bit mask used for push VLAN validate Dekel Peled
2020-01-23  7:56   ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-22 14:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 04/11] net/mlx5: fix allow push VLAN without VID value Dekel Peled
2020-01-23  7:57   ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-22 14:27 ` Dekel Peled [this message]
2020-01-23  7:57   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 05/11] net/mlx5: unify validation of drop action Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-22 14:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 06/11] net/mlx5: fix block push VLAN action on Rx Dekel Peled
2020-01-23  7:57   ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-22 14:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 07/11] net/mlx5: fix block pop VLAN action on Tx Dekel Peled
2020-01-23  7:57   ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-22 14:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 08/11] net/mlx5: fix pop VLAN action validation function Dekel Peled
2020-01-23  7:57   ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-22 14:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 09/11] net/mlx5: fix the set VLAN VID action validation Dekel Peled
2020-01-23  7:58   ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-22 14:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 10/11] net/mlx5: update description of validation funcs Dekel Peled
2020-01-23  7:58   ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-22 14:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 11/11] doc: update MLX5 supported hardware offloads table Dekel Peled
2020-01-23  7:58   ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-26 15:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/11] net/mlx5: vlan actions validation fixes Raslan Darawsheh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=26679816cc524d1b5665fc79ba48b89b37d85dd7.1579703134.git.dekelp@mellanox.com \
    --to=dekelp@mellanox.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=matan@mellanox.com \
    --cc=orika@mellanox.com \
    --cc=rasland@mellanox.com \
    --cc=viacheslavo@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).