From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
Cc: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] doc: convert license headers to SPDX tags
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 18:25:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2697444.chTTJ4k8vY@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM2PR04MB07530A29A489452C1A301A4289E30@AM2PR04MB0753.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
23/01/2018 16:19, Hemant Agrawal:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
>
> > 23/01/2018 14:08, Hemant Agrawal:
> > > This patch will be good if you only add SPDX to it and NOT remove the
> > original license text.
> > > i.e. only do following:
> > >
> > > > -.. BSD LICENSE
> > > > +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> > >
> > > Around RC2 timeframe, I intend to do that. All the remaining but valid
> > license files, we will add SPDX and NOT remove the license text.
> >
> > Hemant, I don't understand why?
> [Hemant]
>
> Changing license for someone else copyright needs their ACK. However we can add SPDX without modifying existing license text
> There are large number of other copyrights and not everyone is converting their license to SPDX only.
>
> In case of linux kernel and uboot, as a first step they just added SPDX to all files without removing the license text.
>
> I was thinking of doing the same so that all the files in DPDK should have SPDX. However, we will not SPDX to files, which are not complaint to DPDK policy.
> We will deal with them separately.
If we don't remove the license now, it will never happen.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-23 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-18 21:07 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: convert license headers to SPDX tags for NIC docs Ferruh Yigit
2017-12-19 5:07 ` Hemant Agrawal
2017-12-19 18:57 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-01-09 14:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: convert license headers to SPDX tags Ferruh Yigit
2018-01-09 15:13 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-01-09 15:31 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-01-09 16:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Ferruh Yigit
2018-01-09 19:34 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-01-23 12:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] " Ferruh Yigit
2018-01-23 12:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] " Ferruh Yigit
2018-01-23 12:58 ` Bruce Richardson
2018-01-23 12:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] " Ferruh Yigit
2018-01-23 13:08 ` Hemant Agrawal
2018-01-23 14:35 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-23 15:19 ` Hemant Agrawal
2018-01-23 17:25 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2018-01-24 5:48 ` Hemant Agrawal
2018-01-24 8:14 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-23 12:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] " Bruce Richardson
2018-02-01 17:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] doc: convert Intel " Ferruh Yigit
2018-02-06 22:33 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-02-01 17:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] doc: convert Intel sharing " Ferruh Yigit
2018-02-06 16:09 ` Kovacevic, Marko
2018-02-06 22:35 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2697444.chTTJ4k8vY@xps \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).