From: "O'driscoll, Tim" <tim.o'driscoll@intel.com>
To: daniel chapiesky <dchapiesky2@gmail.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] to the intel dpdk engineers and all contributors
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 21:28:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA54C30C60@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJnwcoPrq-=cO7vWC5CnqYf9-8ObM2ECLb3RqhvV6-96go-EiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks Daniel. I'm sure the many people who've put a lot of time and effort into building DPDK will really appreciate your kind words.
Tim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of daniel chapiesky
> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 9:47 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] to the intel dpdk engineers and all contributors
>
> I just watched the closing remarks by Tim Driscol at the dpdk summit....
>
> http://youtu.be/r-JA5NBybrs
>
> At time 4:30, he mentioned the "shock to the system" of developers
> expecting a pat on the back and instead receiving critiques of their code.....
>
> I realized that I was one of those who failed to acknowledge the incredible
> work the Intel Engineers and other contributors have produced.
>
> Please let me acknowledge all of you and your efforts with a few comments:
>
> 1) Kudos!!:
>
> 2) The Packet Framework made me run around waving my hands in the air
> yelling: "This is freaking awesome! I don't have to write it myself!!!"
>
> 3) The layered architecture is elegant.
>
> 4) Examples???? The examples are wonderful! Those who wrote the
> examples are my heroes.
>
> 5) Docs? Clear, to the point, and better than the other projects we depend
> upon (you know who you are)
>
> 6) 6Wind - Thank you for taking on the management of the repository and
> website - your coordination effort is truly appreciated
>
> 7) Did I say the Packet Framework saved me so much time I was actually able
> to cut back my coffee intake by 10%!!!!
>
> 8) Windriver - PktGen!!!!! (though I really want to know more about
> mcos....)
>
> Finally,
>
> I recently received a pat on the back for the application I have developed.
> In truth, that pat should be passed on, since my application depends so
> heavily on DPDK.
>
> Thank you.
>
> I encourage others to let the Intel Engineers and contributors know how
> much we appreciate the time and effort they have given to DPDK.
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
> Daniel Chapiesky
> AllSource
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-15 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-15 20:46 daniel chapiesky
2014-10-15 21:28 ` O'driscoll, Tim [this message]
2014-10-15 22:11 ` Matthew Hall
2014-10-16 1:34 ` Wiles, Roger Keith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA54C30C60@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=tim.o'driscoll@intel.com \
--cc=dchapiesky2@gmail.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).