From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29D36B6C9 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 16:16:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Feb 2015 07:10:26 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,609,1418112000"; d="scan'208";a="680381966" Received: from irsmsx103.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.157]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Feb 2015 07:15:49 -0800 Received: from irsmsx102.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.69]) by IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.247]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 15:15:47 +0000 From: "O'driscoll, Tim" To: Thomas Monjalon , Neil Horman Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] Patches outstanding Thread-Index: AQHQSsdOViBUUXSEyUmGoFVnZ5R31Zz39MCAgAAKnwCAABdwEA== Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 15:15:47 +0000 Message-ID: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA54CCFAF1@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20150217103507.7da72f1a@uryu.home.lan> <20150219130829.GE24069@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> <3427184.DR4H9RgUjS@xps13> In-Reply-To: <3427184.DR4H9RgUjS@xps13> Accept-Language: en-IE, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.182] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Patches outstanding X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 15:16:16 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon > Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 1:47 PM > To: Neil Horman > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Stephen Hemminger > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Patches outstanding >=20 > 2015-02-19 08:08, Neil Horman: > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:35:07AM -0500, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > There are currently 1039 patches outstanding on DPDK. > > > What is the schedule for getting these merged or resolved? > > > I don't think it would be reasonable to declare 2.0 as done > > > until the patch backlog is 0! > > > > > > > I think the subtrees were supposed to start biting into this, but I don= 't see > > them getting used yet. >=20 > Yes > Actually the main problem is still on reviews. > There are more good reviews in this cycle. > But some patchset are not reviewed and some others are acked > without being carefully reviewed. Progress on reviews has been a little slow on our side. One of the reasons = for this is that our PRC team are on their new year holidays at the moment,= so we're a little short staffed. They return to the office in the middle o= f next week, after which we'll be back to full strength. We do agree with Thomas on the need for thorough reviews. We're working on = this, so you should see more reviews/acknowledgements soon. Tim