From: "O'Driscoll, Tim" <tim.odriscoll@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Architecture Board Proposal
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 16:23:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA67448AEF@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1502184.oKzFkHpXjH@xps13>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 3:43 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Architecture Board Proposal
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> 2015-10-29 15:21, O'Driscoll, Tim:
> > Scope
> > -----
> > Issues that are within the scope of the Architecture Board include:
> > - Project scope/charter. What is and isn't within the scope of the
> project? What happens if somebody wants to upstream a new
> library/capability and it's not clear whether it fits within DPDK or
> not? As a random example, if somebody wanted to upstream a DPDK-enabled
> TCP/IP stack to dpdk.org, should that be accepted or rejected?
>
> Do you mean the scope of this board would be about the whole projects
> hosted
> on dpdk.org (http://dpdk.org/browse/) or only the DPDK
> (http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk)?
>
> Using your TCP stack example, I think it should be hosted on dpdk.org
> but it may be out of the scope of the DPDK tree.
Good question. I think the scope should be just the DPDK project.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-29 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-29 15:21 O'Driscoll, Tim
2015-10-29 15:43 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-10-29 16:23 ` O'Driscoll, Tim [this message]
2015-10-29 19:48 ` Dave Neary
2015-10-30 11:01 ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2015-10-30 13:11 ` Dave Neary
2015-10-30 13:23 ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2015-10-30 13:25 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-10-30 15:17 ` Dave Neary
2015-10-30 18:05 ` Matthew Hall
2015-11-02 17:50 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-11-18 17:54 ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2015-12-11 9:47 ` O'Driscoll, Tim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA67448AEF@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=tim.odriscoll@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).