From: "O'Driscoll, Tim" <tim.odriscoll@intel.com>
To: Matthew Hall <mhall@mhcomputing.net>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 2.3 Roadmap
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 13:16:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA67470C36@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151201125935.GA20658@mhcomputing.net>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Hall
> Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2015 1:00 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 2.3 Roadmap
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 08:50:58PM +0000, O'Driscoll, Tim wrote:
> > Increase Next Hops for LPM (IPv4): The number of next hops for IPv4
> LPM is
> > currently limited to 256. This will be extended to allow a greater
> number of
> > next hops.
>
> In other threads, we previously proposed doing increased LPM4 *and*
> LPM6.
>
> Having incompatible support between both is a huge headache for me.
>
> And I already contributed patches to fix the issue in both versions.
True. The goal is to merge the best of the various patches that were submitted on this. This could involve changes to IPv6 as well as IPv4.
Tim
>
> Thanks,
> Matthew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-01 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-30 20:50 O'Driscoll, Tim
2015-11-30 21:50 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-11-30 22:19 ` Dave Neary
2015-12-01 11:57 ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2015-11-30 22:30 ` Hobywan Kenoby
2015-12-01 11:52 ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2015-11-30 22:53 ` Kyle Larose
2015-12-01 1:16 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-12-01 10:03 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-12-01 11:26 ` Yoshinobu Inoue
2015-12-01 11:58 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-12-01 13:42 ` Matthew Hall
2015-12-01 14:45 ` Kyle Larose
2015-12-01 19:28 ` Matthew Hall
2015-12-02 0:53 ` Yoshinobu Inoue
2015-12-01 14:27 ` Panu Matilainen
2015-12-01 14:48 ` Vincent JARDIN
2015-12-01 14:58 ` Panu Matilainen
2015-12-01 15:16 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2015-12-01 15:19 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-12-01 15:31 ` Aaron Conole
2015-12-01 15:54 ` Richardson, Bruce
2015-12-02 1:38 ` Wiles, Keith
2015-12-02 2:42 ` Matthew Hall
2015-12-01 19:32 ` Matthew Hall
2015-12-02 11:24 ` Neil Horman
2015-12-01 12:59 ` Matthew Hall
2015-12-01 13:16 ` O'Driscoll, Tim [this message]
2015-12-01 13:44 ` Matthew Hall
2015-12-01 13:57 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-12-01 19:49 ` Matthew Hall
2015-12-02 12:35 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-12-02 15:47 ` Matthew Hall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA67470C36@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=tim.odriscoll@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=mhall@mhcomputing.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).