From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <tim.odriscoll@intel.com>
Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32288231C
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue,  1 Dec 2015 14:17:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21])
 by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Dec 2015 05:17:08 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,369,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="862142317"
Received: from irsmsx107.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.99])
 by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Dec 2015 05:16:50 -0800
Received: from irsmsx155.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.192.3) by
 IRSMSX107.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.3.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 14.3.248.2; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 13:16:48 +0000
Received: from irsmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.23]) by
 irsmsx155.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.14.190]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002;
 Tue, 1 Dec 2015 13:16:47 +0000
From: "O'Driscoll, Tim" <tim.odriscoll@intel.com>
To: Matthew Hall <mhall@mhcomputing.net>
Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] 2.3 Roadmap
Thread-Index: AdErsIjfg5kVwCCOTr635FzIeMmmbwAh5fmAAACMb3A=
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 13:16:47 +0000
Message-ID: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA67470C36@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA674705F1@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <20151201125935.GA20658@mhcomputing.net>
In-Reply-To: <20151201125935.GA20658@mhcomputing.net>
Accept-Language: en-IE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-inteldataclassification: CTP_IC
x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsIiwiaWQiOiI4MzU5YjEyOC02MTAzLTQ3NWEtOGIzMC0yYjRhZWI4Y2JjYzciLCJwcm9wcyI6W3sibiI6IkludGVsRGF0YUNsYXNzaWZpY2F0aW9uIiwidmFscyI6W3sidmFsdWUiOiJDVFBfSUMifV19XX0sIlN1YmplY3RMYWJlbHMiOltdLCJUTUNWZXJzaW9uIjoiMTUuNC4xMC4xOSIsIlRydXN0ZWRMYWJlbEhhc2giOiI0V1BOVlFGZE1qNWVpaTY3OG43aTR0d3poaFlJNmxLbWZGWG9cL29JNWJKbz0ifQ==
x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.182]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 2.3 Roadmap
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 13:17:24 -0000


> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Hall
> Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2015 1:00 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 2.3 Roadmap
>=20
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 08:50:58PM +0000, O'Driscoll, Tim wrote:
> > Increase Next Hops for LPM (IPv4): The number of next hops for IPv4
> LPM is
> > currently limited to 256. This will be extended to allow a greater
> number of
> > next hops.
>=20
> In other threads, we previously proposed doing increased LPM4 *and*
> LPM6.
>=20
> Having incompatible support between both is a huge headache for me.
>=20
> And I already contributed patches to fix the issue in both versions.

True. The goal is to merge the best of the various patches that were submit=
ted on this. This could involve changes to IPv6 as well as IPv4.


Tim

>=20
> Thanks,
> Matthew