From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32288231C for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 14:17:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Dec 2015 05:17:08 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,369,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="862142317" Received: from irsmsx107.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.99]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Dec 2015 05:16:50 -0800 Received: from irsmsx155.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.192.3) by IRSMSX107.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.3.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 13:16:48 +0000 Received: from irsmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.23]) by irsmsx155.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.14.190]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 13:16:47 +0000 From: "O'Driscoll, Tim" To: Matthew Hall Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] 2.3 Roadmap Thread-Index: AdErsIjfg5kVwCCOTr635FzIeMmmbwAh5fmAAACMb3A= Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 13:16:47 +0000 Message-ID: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA67470C36@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA674705F1@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> <20151201125935.GA20658@mhcomputing.net> In-Reply-To: <20151201125935.GA20658@mhcomputing.net> Accept-Language: en-IE, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-inteldataclassification: CTP_IC x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsIiwiaWQiOiI4MzU5YjEyOC02MTAzLTQ3NWEtOGIzMC0yYjRhZWI4Y2JjYzciLCJwcm9wcyI6W3sibiI6IkludGVsRGF0YUNsYXNzaWZpY2F0aW9uIiwidmFscyI6W3sidmFsdWUiOiJDVFBfSUMifV19XX0sIlN1YmplY3RMYWJlbHMiOltdLCJUTUNWZXJzaW9uIjoiMTUuNC4xMC4xOSIsIlRydXN0ZWRMYWJlbEhhc2giOiI0V1BOVlFGZE1qNWVpaTY3OG43aTR0d3poaFlJNmxLbWZGWG9cL29JNWJKbz0ifQ== x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.182] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 2.3 Roadmap X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 13:17:24 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Hall > Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2015 1:00 PM > To: O'Driscoll, Tim > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 2.3 Roadmap >=20 > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 08:50:58PM +0000, O'Driscoll, Tim wrote: > > Increase Next Hops for LPM (IPv4): The number of next hops for IPv4 > LPM is > > currently limited to 256. This will be extended to allow a greater > number of > > next hops. >=20 > In other threads, we previously proposed doing increased LPM4 *and* > LPM6. >=20 > Having incompatible support between both is a huge headache for me. >=20 > And I already contributed patches to fix the issue in both versions. True. The goal is to merge the best of the various patches that were submit= ted on this. This could involve changes to IPv6 as well as IPv4. Tim >=20 > Thanks, > Matthew