From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E7A8A04BA; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 23:33:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E721D5B2; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 23:33:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90EAE1D527 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 23:33:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 018161558; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 17:33:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 01 Oct 2020 17:33:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= 75fLdet9GHyG6galUhgMILyFhenoo66IVnBrncC+pG0=; b=kzmz9rxyJJ/IFI0J syY9dDPq/nknOeOzBDMmxVq3qiXQG4029UEjJJysKPIVXlP6VMjEdBaMhUsmZdn3 N+JnAmE1YPNGUjrckglgjge9q5SmX9Z7pC1e5DCbZDoYh3FbLO8yK5l1jyhWOWLE mktbvgoKNGuqPooxDqxiN+Iy+FWZVOVjovUqhD+MCUoHVTMt99154ieXG82a2HMd Oba9oTqbiENacYu+1UdUL6BTIhmRX/rwRTtqYammuceEwznRP3v6O7UFuej0mofK q5k9WCV9mOifTnLxEp6Ev4c1/1aH2rGfVN8BXH2LTW70STeoMYDkcgXUQpUm/P1l Ujw8TQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=75fLdet9GHyG6galUhgMILyFhenoo66IVnBrncC+p G0=; b=UkPE0O9h5PxfLucqXJnoVCNondRyjcTKdwzLAWtwkx2DaYpNu4juh3ksz DshuyMhgBAik0FYaY6Y966tomGEVNVnBpwey4Bz0e2W3YuRSAoj66JoNzT6DoEET vSzYYGGebH+5wV4i1OAQx2hxMyYxMG5O9gQ4hzFvF9DRS044w+cpeti6KFgJWeK8 TfBtbVdIYAAFT71Z4CyGCdnXclJGMyv9zNH/tbtvS6kRXH22aPnyyEhJM1Xl991j 13Su2jFmScq6671BviUqXsL/OAuNBzFeIbysTm5zN5YylV8YRkfIsr/3w415PWuP WOuFfwGZgzws3/MQGcKRuI8itLqtQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrfeeggdduieehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3C0B53280063; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 17:33:12 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Maxime Coquelin Cc: dev@dpdk.org, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, david.marchand@redhat.com, john.mcnamara@intel.com Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 23:33:10 +0200 Message-ID: <2715653.HrAAcl6WpO@thomas> In-Reply-To: <3759283.WSBrEPX1tx@thomas> References: <20201001103650.208049-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> <3759283.WSBrEPX1tx@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: add Vhost and Virtio updates to release note X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 01/10/2020 14:53, Thomas Monjalon: > 01/10/2020 13:45, Maxime Coquelin: > > > > On 10/1/20 1:42 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > 01/10/2020 12:36, Maxime Coquelin: > > >> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin > > >> --- > > >> doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_11.rst | 10 ++++++++++ > > >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > > > > > Those changes should have been part of the original commits. > > > Please can you add the "Fixes:" lines so we can have an easy > > > reference to the code change? > > > > I'm not convinced it is a good idea, as it creates avoidable conflicts > > when someone wants to backport features. > > Not sure I understand the conflict you think of. > > > But if you insist I can do it. I did the release notes updates in the relevant patches while pulling next-net. I've removed the deprecation notice as well.