From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com (mail-wi0-f179.google.com
 [209.85.212.179]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E18B924B
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:26:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wicfx6 with SMTP id fx6so79767970wic.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 01:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=O8dE2QooORUIy0DAtnM0aIyy9KbTsed5rSIziXTU4vI=;
 b=DG0nz6YToTczhK1qMGTv5gOFz0WYMnf1HhM5u1rSy3DxnY1wB+kCsET4su+LasE2sk
 vqHJQpRNbUB85FX2QHK88h5uQbTQNTSF1AxryzfzaTTA98KF5YXqmWEPDsm9Zp2CcDTu
 /1tFe+f5jLI/K05LvYa8J9DO91KMYZXNDp4VdqggAZEqDbXF//zpMTBYePqCsjt+7Spa
 S7HVj2geDKbeSDdEviR87d/2P8YM+btneFQnADKeUbloB1Gk9a6VJj4YNAiRxvs5GRkm
 4hZFVNj/JDEiIz2kUNk7Y8AhdKOVfTD1jg3WpTPWA7qroj8imt6KCS3IgbdPlTc83OMS
 /F9w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkR2FGfESQDq44c7vytFGYHzFs+5LhBqAiUPLnYBgKpc3EThtsfEAWhUwFektMjT0C2dN4W
X-Received: by 10.194.110.170 with SMTP id ib10mr10189471wjb.69.1445415976950; 
 Wed, 21 Oct 2015 01:26:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xps13.localnet (guy78-3-82-239-227-177.fbx.proxad.net.
 [82.239.227.177])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bk4sm8852494wjc.1.2015.10.21.01.26.16
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Wed, 21 Oct 2015 01:26:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:25:12 +0200
Message-ID: <2717598.bIV87FGGpb@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <20151020213424.696541ad@xeon-e3>
References: <20151015144406.1aaca698@xeon-e3> <20151020213424.696541ad@xeon-e3>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK patch backlog
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 08:26:17 -0000

2015-10-20 21:34, Stephen Hemminger:
> Patch backlog is not getting better, now at 486.
> 
> How can we break this logjam?
> Do I need to make a new "ready for merge" tree?

What would mean "ready for merge"?
A lot of patches are acked but do not compile or doc is missing.

I have the feeling it would become easier if there were mailing-list, patchwork
and git tree dedicated to some areas. What about starting with drivers/net?