From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7448CA0032; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 11:15:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 089FE41147; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 11:15:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7727240151; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 11:15:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F425C006A; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 05:15:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 14 Sep 2022 05:15:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1663146914; x= 1663233314; bh=s2Z6nZvlKmxxqVB2vgj02MJv3PIIwkAI2TPAcHvyG38=; b=g Xqwu6ThiqCFrslhrmR8Oegoj7RMfJ4CRkFOVeeNo8soIdbpYz8FTzXagpIiquabu LWbTGp/qbC0w/w8sQnwRGTzxHxjPH9ulGSnPDv8wP0mcm7mpgnl/kms/I2qickbB Sob3693O8JYc59joY0qXcrbgnz/qtcX6RdIFfBj+HSsHkkNIb5G9EoDQLDC3v0G7 kl/UwbmhdmHK30TUp75RuTrdHDDwVIc7WEXRyiZ5lWpFZUbfPVkvln+Pfe4P5Hdh bDgaJKotpodl0hkCDaeyqBFXA2YT+ME3wjc03kHvPtxVUsaTAPuzxtBjrcmDoUKF +jpu2ymeUjuoI+XJLR6gQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1663146914; x= 1663233314; bh=s2Z6nZvlKmxxqVB2vgj02MJv3PIIwkAI2TPAcHvyG38=; b=p Y/qF0QcCM9X1j2b38Ia+cjqPuzrDjF24Hpvp6rJyYGwYzv/UPmrmCxoXONzqmeXr 7cN2Mk1Fv4/VxnVcM7hIvetzNq4yLJcDHSN5rWc4c7rUuzz3QhPd5YW7bnQ/MaZJ WyBJ8SF4eGtCpKt54dtS2Lz4n5gRckXzYjrWsuCmXQMaLBGNgbTTCh95dHRUVvAz DS52e0t0WHaNSADeFyYenbV8wjXT39uBx3zDZRKXss0Ew5aBv8ny5ZAU8mKrvKfj Z+jzqNJklQ7ZkxZ+zrPXWcwW6V4xGjDDhe4z1BcQwYRzQIUFKEV1TAY4iZMGAAkf O8C41OLPZAC22YJnfVPeQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrfeduiedgudegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvvefufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedtjeeiieefhedtfffgvdelteeufeefheeujefgueetfedttdei kefgkeduhedtgfenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfh hrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 05:15:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Xia, Chenbo" , David Marchand , Maxime Coquelin Cc: "stable@dpdk.org" , "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] vhost: fix vq use after free on NUMA reallocation Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 11:15:11 +0200 Message-ID: <2718825.BEx9A2HvPv@thomas> In-Reply-To: <8e7d0748-afa9-0ed0-443a-62b2523d7403@redhat.com> References: <20220722135320.109269-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> <8e7d0748-afa9-0ed0-443a-62b2523d7403@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 14/09/2022 09:14, Maxime Coquelin: > On 9/14/22 03:05, Xia, Chenbo wrote: > > From: Maxime Coquelin > >> On 7/26/22 09:55, Maxime Coquelin wrote: > >> The bug this patch is fixing is being reproduced downstream. > >> It would be great it gets merged in main branch rapidly so that we can > >> perform the backport. > >> > >> Chenbo, are you planning a pull request for vhost/virtio in the next few > >> days? If not, should the main branch maintainer pick this single patch > >> directly and let the rest of the series more time for reviews? > > > > Based on the status of all patches in the list, I guess PR will not happen > > this week. So it will be good if David/Thomas can directly pick up this. > > OK, sounds good to me. > > Thomas/David, is that good on your side? Is there a blocker to merge the whole series?