From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com (mail-wm0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 021D6E62 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 20:18:31 +0100 (CET) Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so27958583wme.1 for ; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 11:18:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=ydMBIGkJxV2U2Vd9+ysd0Zh2+3G7TvK/Rr16SpDvEgo=; b=iirH0rW3zf9GadLvjuEBTYayHi2eOlxweOJ21+6oWVGmca0VozeWHNnLgKhd5tAbYz 4P/QxrOwCPkwejo3vvVXi3fMKz3zFWwH4a/9hK8ZUo9UkImjjRXZW6P8u0t8/pziP2xo VmHMeXFMAryxHxbitjVafZ+k423t2MCmZf7Ia6g3RL+/rE+4ljmftPa8GZj/oi4+v/Xj 5h8onLp1/5rcCWvSLGPEIfyndvU8MySmpKi+ppe6Ird1BOQMn/Csv+xaXMLFxEJcNOaC XPdkSpX6HSl3dDsxhC3YOgPxwBY4qs03rEtlDWwKjJ3bsub1ow+iMg/q+VtQnwWq82HP 8xxA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=ydMBIGkJxV2U2Vd9+ysd0Zh2+3G7TvK/Rr16SpDvEgo=; b=ICqvPbBKGGxUR8Oe8qYQ3hZCmSbjm/UIA9bj5RcgF96ePd0WfJkbO2QVMunZvRvNaI Ur1hDh20UKV3mcBDSV7sM5F8kIutfGvRvtGCLwYoMZuE8BZ8JwS9HFVcqRBrhrQoClRC 17q9nxvD5TT+vT0vmSNrYbsZ7MCeSH0AvWUjYPD+oAHCllkHc3luTP1XJbaRkknNouko x7asEaqAGLljAb6f5vP7m0QQNZ2JjWb/4OewCXPlWNRy/Rt5MwX1SOjgZ09YU1LaKEyR sQQ0lYufi6CHF2LsmIyRTf95dkx2W1X1aAGy71s2ezzbyu94XyPaumFxQM+9aU3+52aD 5w7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQljuCkpG82pVTrgPzBLdAtgVCcQDsMtA4AiHMj/K9Vz5nan6RGplu/Fkync76SwApVLgfGt X-Received: by 10.194.63.238 with SMTP id j14mr93341659wjs.172.1448997510803; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 11:18:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (guy78-3-82-239-227-177.fbx.proxad.net. [82.239.227.177]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e83sm27506968wmc.23.2015.12.01.11.18.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 01 Dec 2015 11:18:30 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Mario Carrillo Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 20:17:20 +0100 Message-ID: <2719219.0ADflfCWst@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1448931205-17357-1-git-send-email-mario.alfredo.c.arevalo@intel.com> References: <1442608390-12537-1-git-send-email-mario.alfredo.c.arevalo@intel.com> <1448931205-17357-1-git-send-email-mario.alfredo.c.arevalo@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org, jos.c.venegas.munoz@intel.com Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 00/11] Add installation rules for dpdk files. X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 19:18:31 -0000 Hi Mario, Thanks for your work. There are some interesting ideas :) I'm going to send a patchset to establish the same kind of rules keeping the old install behaviour and allowing a standard one with the same name (install). The result would be closed to what pkg/dpdk.spec provides. Your review would be appreciated.