Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/5] app/testpmd: move ethdev events registration

[Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>]

25/10/2018 10:54, Iremonger, Bernard:
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
> > 24/10/2018 17:55, Iremonger, Bernard:
> > > Hi Thomas,
> > >
> > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
> > > > +/* Pretty printing of ethdev events */ static const char * const
> > > > +eth_event_desc[] = {
> > > > +	[RTE_ETH_EVENT_UNKNOWN] = "unknown",
> > > > +	[RTE_ETH_EVENT_INTR_LSC] = "LSC",
> > >
> > > How about replacing "LSC" with "interrupt link status change"
> > 
> > When it is printed, "event" is appended.
> > So I think "interrupt" is a bit too much.
> > OK for "link state change"?
> 
> Yes,
>  
> > > > +	[RTE_ETH_EVENT_QUEUE_STATE] = "queue state",
> > > > +	[RTE_ETH_EVENT_INTR_RESET] = "interrupt reset",
> 
> Should "interrupt" be dropped from "interrupt reset" too for consistency? 

Yes, you're right.

> > > > +	[RTE_ETH_EVENT_VF_MBOX] = "VF mbox",
> > > > +	[RTE_ETH_EVENT_IPSEC] = "IPsec",
> > > > +	[RTE_ETH_EVENT_MACSEC] = "MACsec",
> > > > +	[RTE_ETH_EVENT_INTR_RMV] = "device removal",
> > >
> > > How about replacing "device removal" with "interrupt device removal"
> > 
> > For same reason, I think "device removal" is enough.
> > It will be printed as "device removal event".

I will send a v2 today.
Thanks for the review.