From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE7F2A0093; Sat, 21 May 2022 00:08:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 897D840222; Sat, 21 May 2022 00:08:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm6nam12on2060.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.243.60]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04F5340156 for ; Sat, 21 May 2022 00:08:10 +0200 (CEST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=JmQWg94ONPfhY5eiBzbwNAUJ7jS2nYrEmh3V3nxRMKsa14zgVXEEeELjyhtK/lmysWbXfM/KJjOgTEsXkgeW0Tamh91iHQzdCymQoKycT+6mhscyEOOM638NKO5Dv37L4vE3u0wFmyEAgBPqk0KHOay1H3nQs8idcLBdselJMJdCoRzyxia5e5Zwq2Q+S5mjDSY48YpuAyvc50Yq+aej5qh12QbtF44JwssX0BIPOZErbaGcq2z4fMUvkTyvnM24q6BUopJR6D+AmQGcDqvAvynBq3fVFp7Iqm9U1v3fYHaEdkiN6llysf3hUdYRmCWwo7e/OvHtS541SD/Rnne7vQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=ZrZO9eRWpxbXfaJag4Rai4cYgGAYOKQ3Qfg5ncs1z0s=; b=AacjTV2f8jPxO3/vhjdJ038RoBtcRFpxY5woqfTS69UmNZZ3FjMsH6zfk4jE42e7icRUz1UspOYP2XSEjHCcBl2k19tnK1RuKlrh4EYy3PBSqcrr7tTOwTEP1Ztn0ITz29qlJCWF5iPJOygvADjImMIOwbPavEcQthTr082Ni0eW2sz6FvuFE+pxNid7l6jFWt52QH77aZj8b5+KWMuODJR/CMqtWYs/EerdmE2cD49HT6r7yWbAQbxd6r0qyX22Omgxa1Zoq8rzlL2/ekdp5AXwLuc1C0ntMR3AQYHuQeN4+I/bn+eAcq5IhAKswgsh/UWK9N9770BtuHWoVCQl/g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=softfail (sender ip is 149.199.80.198) smtp.rcpttodomain=gmail.com smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine sp=quarantine pct=100) action=quarantine header.from=amd.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xilinx.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-xilinx-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ZrZO9eRWpxbXfaJag4Rai4cYgGAYOKQ3Qfg5ncs1z0s=; b=P4MET2uixq7Qlx2Pg2bUHjVu2vCI39ZxHDBIm6Y3Ouk/CPCaeUrJ0UFmnRojCZc1/AJ4rwE9yTXkvcbo3IadwD7gIssr78lh+a5yAz6OdWHAkhqG0OldJAsI7tIpUoBKM3kRpzPVSanmv61xicmQ8CseTPTd4flVO4OSoxqnZVg= Received: from BN6PR17CA0055.namprd17.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:405:75::44) by BYAPR02MB5382.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:9d::23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5250.14; Fri, 20 May 2022 22:08:08 +0000 Received: from BN1NAM02FT017.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:405:75:cafe::40) by BN6PR17CA0055.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:405:75::44) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5273.17 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 20 May 2022 22:08:07 +0000 X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=softfail (sender IP is 149.199.80.198) smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=fail action=quarantine header.from=amd.com; Received-SPF: SoftFail (protection.outlook.com: domain of transitioning amd.com discourages use of 149.199.80.198 as permitted sender) Received: from xir-pvapexch01.xlnx.xilinx.com (149.199.80.198) by BN1NAM02FT017.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.2.134) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.20.5273.14 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 20 May 2022 22:08:07 +0000 Received: from xir-pvapexch01.xlnx.xilinx.com (172.21.17.15) by xir-pvapexch01.xlnx.xilinx.com (172.21.17.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.14; Fri, 20 May 2022 23:08:06 +0100 Received: from smtp.xilinx.com (172.21.105.198) by xir-pvapexch01.xlnx.xilinx.com (172.21.17.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.2176.14 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 20 May 2022 23:08:06 +0100 Envelope-to: u9012063@gmail.com, mk@semihalf.com, dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com, dev@dpdk.org, igorch@amazon.com, evgenys@amazon.com, shaibran@amazon.com, mw@semihalf.com, navasile@linux.microsoft.com Received: from [10.71.116.2] (port=59958) by smtp.xilinx.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90) (envelope-from ) id 1nsAn0-00076Q-Ag; Fri, 20 May 2022 23:08:06 +0100 Message-ID: <27840df9-93b2-4385-ef81-aa63222510d0@amd.com> Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 23:08:05 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC] net/ena: Add Windows support. Content-Language: en-US To: William Tu , =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=c5=82_Krawczyk?= CC: Dmitry Kozlyuk , dpdk-dev , Igor Chauskin , Evgeny Schemeilin , Shai Brandes , Marcin Wojtas , Narcisa Ana Maria Vasile References: <20210814033609.58553-1-u9012063@gmail.com> <20210814143108.128803ef@sovereign> From: Ferruh Yigit In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: adb245ab-44f2-45d1-f44b-08da3aad3878 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: BYAPR02MB5382:EE_ X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 2 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:149.199.80.198; CTRY:IE; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:CAL; SFV:NSPM; H:xir-pvapexch01.xlnx.xilinx.com; PTR:unknown-80-198.xilinx.com; CAT:NONE; SFS:(13230001)(4636009)(40470700004)(46966006)(36756003)(2906002)(31686004)(83380400001)(40460700003)(47076005)(316002)(110136005)(54906003)(86362001)(31696002)(5660300002)(35950700001)(2616005)(336012)(8676002)(508600001)(9786002)(70206006)(70586007)(8936002)(4744005)(4326008)(356005)(7636003)(44832011)(26005)(53546011)(82310400005)(50156003)(43740500002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; X-OriginatorOrg: xilinx.onmicrosoft.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 May 2022 22:08:07.5832 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: adb245ab-44f2-45d1-f44b-08da3aad3878 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 657af505-d5df-48d0-8300-c31994686c5c X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=657af505-d5df-48d0-8300-c31994686c5c; Ip=[149.199.80.198]; Helo=[xir-pvapexch01.xlnx.xilinx.com] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BN1NAM02FT017.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR02MB5382 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On 8/30/2021 3:05 PM, William Tu wrote: > On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 12:12 AM Michał Krawczyk wrote: > [...] >> Hi William, >> >> It's great to hear that you're working on ENA support for Windows! >> >> ENA PMD uses admin interrupt for processing all the commands like >> creating the IO queues, setting up the MTU, etc., and also for the >> AENQ events. With the current driver design it's critical to have this >> admin interrupt working. >> >> It looks like the admin interrupt is not functional and from what I've >> seen in the email regarding the v21.11 roadmap for the Windows >> support, the netuio interrupt support is going to be added in the >> future. That might be the reason for you seeing those errors. > > Hi Michal, > Thank you! Then I will wait for netuio support. > William Hi William, Michał, This is a very old thread, but still in the patchwork, I wonder if is there any update on the issue?