From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Yong Wang <yongwang@vmware.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] vmxnet3 pmd fixes/improvement
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 15:40:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2785109.uTPxqbdWuM@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AA3F441F262C58498CD6D0C1801DE7EB0ABB1E18@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Hi Yong,
Is there any progress with this patchset?
Thanks
--
Thomas
2014-10-22 07:07, Cao, Waterman:
> Hi Yong,
>
> We verified your patch with VMWare ESXi 5.5 and found VMware L2fwd and L3fwd cmd can't run.
> But We use DPDK1.7_rc1 package to validate VMware regression, It works fine.
> .
> 1.[Test Environment]:
> - VMware ESXi 5.5;
> - 2 VM
> - FC20 on Host / FC20-64 on VM
> - Crown Pass server (E2680 v2 ivy bridge )
> - Niantic 82599
>
> 2. [Test Topology]:
> Create 2VMs (Fedora 18, 64bit) .
> We pass through one physical port(Niantic 82599) to each VM, and also create one virtual device: vmxnet3 in each VM.
> To connect with two VMs, we use one vswitch to connect two vmxnet3 interface.
> Then, PF1 and vmxnet3A are in VM1; PF2 and vmxnet3B are in VM2.
> The traffic flow for l2fwd/l3fwd is as below::
> Ixia -> PF1 -> vmxnet3A -> vswitch -> vmxnet3B -> PF2 -> Ixia. (traffic generator)
>
> 3.[ Test Step]:
>
> tar dpdk1.8.rc1 ,compile and run;
>
> L2fwd: ./build/l2fwd -c f -n 4 -- -p 0x3
> L3fwd: ./build/l3fwd-vf -c 0x6 -n 4 -- -p 0x3 -config "(0,0,1),(1,0,2)"
>
> 4.[Error log]:
>
> ---VMware L2fwd:---
>
> EAL: 0000:0b:00.0 not managed by UIO driver, skipping
> EAL: PCI device 0000:13:00.0 on NUMA socket -1
> EAL: probe driver: 8086:10fb rte_ixgbe_pmd
> EAL: PCI memory mapped at 0x7f678ae6e000
> EAL: PCI memory mapped at 0x7f678af34000
> PMD: eth_ixgbe_dev_init(): MAC: 2, PHY: 17, SFP+: 5
> PMD: eth_ixgbe_dev_init(): port 0 vendorID=0x8086 deviceID=0x10fb
> EAL: PCI device 0000:1b:00.0 on NUMA socket -1
> EAL: probe driver: 15ad:7b0 rte_vmxnet3_pmd
> EAL: PCI memory mapped at 0x7f678af33000
> EAL: PCI memory mapped at 0x7f678af32000
> EAL: PCI memory mapped at 0x7f678af30000
> Lcore 0: RX port 0
> Lcore 1: RX port 1
> Initializing port 0... PMD: ixgbe_dev_rx_queue_setup(): sw_ring=0x7f670b0f5580 hw_ring=0x7f6789fe5280 dma_addr=0x373e5280
> PMD: ixgbe_dev_rx_queue_setup(): Rx Burst Bulk Alloc Preconditions are satisfied. Rx Burst Bulk Alloc function will be used on port=0, queue=0.
> PMD: ixgbe_dev_rx_queue_setup(): Vector rx enabled, please make sure RX burst size no less than 32.
> PMD: ixgbe_dev_tx_queue_setup(): sw_ring=0x7f670b0f3480 hw_ring=0x7f671b820080 dma_addr=0x100020080
> PMD: ixgbe_dev_tx_queue_setup(): Using simple tx code path
> PMD: ixgbe_dev_tx_queue_setup(): Vector tx enabled.
> done:
> Port 0, MAC address: 90:E2:BA:4A:33:78
>
> Initializing port 1... EAL: Error - exiting with code: 1
> Cause: rte_eth_tx_queue_setup:err=-22, port=1
>
> ---VMware L3fwd:---
>
> EAL: TSC frequency is ~2793265 KHz
> EAL: Master core 1 is ready (tid=9f49a880)
> EAL: Core 2 is ready (tid=1d7f2700)
> EAL: PCI device 0000:0b:00.0 on NUMA socket -1
> EAL: probe driver: 15ad:7b0 rte_vmxnet3_pmd
> EAL: 0000:0b:00.0 not managed by UIO driver, skipping
> EAL: PCI device 0000:13:00.0 on NUMA socket -1
> EAL: probe driver: 8086:10fb rte_ixgbe_pmd
> EAL: PCI memory mapped at 0x7f079f3e4000
> EAL: PCI memory mapped at 0x7f079f4aa000
> PMD: eth_ixgbe_dev_init(): MAC: 2, PHY: 17, SFP+: 5
> PMD: eth_ixgbe_dev_init(): port 0 vendorID=0x8086 deviceID=0x10fb
> EAL: PCI device 0000:1b:00.0 on NUMA socket -1
> EAL: probe driver: 15ad:7b0 rte_vmxnet3_pmd
> EAL: PCI memory mapped at 0x7f079f4a9000
> EAL: PCI memory mapped at 0x7f079f4a8000
> EAL: PCI memory mapped at 0x7f079f4a6000
> Initializing port 0 ... Creating queues: nb_rxq=1 nb_txq=1... Address:90:E2:BA:4A:33:78, Allocated mbuf pool on socket 0
> LPM: Adding route 0x01010100 / 24 (0)
> LPM: Adding route 0x02010100 / 24 (1)
> LPM: Adding route 0x03010100 / 24 (2)
> LPM: Adding route 0x04010100 / 24 (3)
> LPM: Adding route 0x05010100 / 24 (4)
> LPM: Adding route 0x06010100 / 24 (5)
> LPM: Adding route 0x07010100 / 24 (6)
> LPM: Adding route 0x08010100 / 24 (7)
> txq=0,0,0 PMD: ixgbe_dev_tx_queue_setup(): sw_ring=0x7f071f6f3c80 hw_ring=0x7f079e5e5280 dma_addr=0x373e5280
> PMD: ixgbe_dev_tx_queue_setup(): Using simple tx code path
> PMD: ixgbe_dev_tx_queue_setup(): Vector tx enabled.
>
> Initializing port 1 ... Creating queues: nb_rxq=1 nb_txq=1... Address:00:0C:29:F0:90:41, txq=1,0,0 EAL: Error - exiting with code: 1
> Cause: rte_eth_tx_queue_setup: err=-22, port=1
>
>
> Can you help to recheck this patch with latest DPDK code?
>
> Regards
> Waterman
>
> -----Original Message-----
> >From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Yong Wang
> >Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 6:10 AM
> >To: Patel, Rashmin N; Stephen Hemminger
> >Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> >Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] vmxnet3 pmd fixes/improvement
> >
> >Rashmin/Stephen,
> >
> >Since you have worked on vmxnet3 pmd drivers, I wonder if you can help review this set of patches. Any other reviews/test verifications are welcome of course. We have reviewed/tested all patches internally.
> >
> >Yong
> >________________________________________
> >From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> on behalf of Yong Wang <yongwang@vmware.com>
> >Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 2:00 PM
> >To: Thomas Monjalon
> >Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> >Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] vmxnet3 pmd fixes/improvement
> >
> >Only the last one is performance related and it merely tries to give hints to the compiler to hopefully make branch prediction more efficient. It also moves a constant assignment out of the pkt polling loop.
> >
> >We did performance evaluation on a Nehalem box with 4cores@2.8GHz x 2 socket:
> >On the DPDK-side, it's running some l3 forwarding apps in a VM on ESXi with one core assigned for polling. The client side is pktgen/dpdk, pumping 64B tcp packets at line rate. Before the patch, we are seeing ~900K PPS with 65% cpu of a core used for DPDK. After the patch, we are seeing the same pkt rate with only 45% of a core used. CPU usage is collected factoring our the idle loop cost. The packet rate is a result of the mode we used for vmxnet3 (pure emulation mode running default number of hypervisor contexts). I can add these info in the review request.
> >
> >Yong
> >________________________________________
> >From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
> >Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 1:29 PM
> >To: Yong Wang
> >Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> >Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] vmxnet3 pmd fixes/improvement
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >2014-10-12 23:23, Yong Wang:
> >> This patch series include various fixes and improvement to the
> >> vmxnet3 pmd driver.
> >>
> >> Yong Wang (5):
> >> vmxnet3: Fix VLAN Rx stripping
> >> vmxnet3: Add VLAN Tx offload
> >> vmxnet3: Fix dev stop/restart bug
> >> vmxnet3: Add rx pkt check offloads
> >> vmxnet3: Some perf improvement on the rx path
> >
> >Please, could describe what is the performance gain for these patches?
> >Benchmark numbers would be appreciated.
> >
> >Thanks
> >--
> >Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-28 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-13 6:23 Yong Wang
2014-10-13 6:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/5] vmxnet3: Fix VLAN Rx stripping Yong Wang
2014-10-13 9:31 ` Stephen Hemminger
2014-10-13 18:42 ` Yong Wang
2014-10-22 13:39 ` Stephen Hemminger
2014-10-28 21:57 ` Yong Wang
2014-10-29 9:04 ` Bruce Richardson
2014-10-29 9:41 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-10-29 17:57 ` Yong Wang
2014-10-29 18:51 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-10-13 6:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/5] vmxnet3: Add VLAN Tx offload Yong Wang
2014-10-13 6:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/5] vmxnet3: Fix dev stop/restart bug Yong Wang
2014-10-13 6:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/5] vmxnet3: Add rx pkt check offloads Yong Wang
2014-10-13 6:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/5] vmxnet3: Some perf improvement on the rx path Yong Wang
2014-11-05 0:13 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-10-13 20:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] vmxnet3 pmd fixes/improvement Thomas Monjalon
2014-10-13 21:00 ` Yong Wang
2014-10-21 22:10 ` Yong Wang
2014-10-22 7:07 ` Cao, Waterman
2014-10-28 14:40 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2014-10-28 19:59 ` Yong Wang
2014-10-29 0:33 ` Cao, Waterman
2014-11-05 1:32 ` Cao, Waterman
2014-11-04 5:57 ` Zhang, XiaonanX
2014-11-04 22:50 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-11-05 5:26 ` Cao, Waterman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2785109.uTPxqbdWuM@xps13 \
--to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=yongwang@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).