DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] net: replace ifdefs with runtime branches
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2019 21:30:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2785804.vqP48ztxbI@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190529154132.49955-5-bruce.richardson@intel.com>

29/05/2019 17:41, Bruce Richardson:
> Use the flag checking functions and a couple of empty stubs to remove the
> ifdefs from the middle of the C code, and replace them with more readable
> regular if statements. Other ifdefs at the top of the file are kept, but
> are not mixed with C code, so there is a clean separation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_net/rte_net_crc.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

The result is more lines of code :)

> --- a/lib/librte_net/rte_net_crc.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_net/rte_net_crc.c
> @@ -18,8 +18,17 @@
>  
>  #ifdef X86_64_SSE42_PCLMULQDQ
>  #include <net_crc_sse.h>
> -#elif defined ARM64_NEON_PMULL
> +#else
> +/* define stubs for the SSE functions to avoid compiler errors */
> +#define handlers_sse42 handlers_scalar
> +#define rte_net_crc_sse42_init() do { } while(0)
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifdef ARM64_NEON_PMULL
>  #include <net_crc_neon.h>
> +#else
> +#define handlers_neon handlers_scalar
> +#define rte_net_crc_neon_init() do { } while(0)
>  #endif

Looking at the need for stubs, I don't see the benefit.

>  rte_net_crc_set_alg(enum rte_net_crc_alg alg)
>  {
>  	switch (alg) {
> -#ifdef X86_64_SSE42_PCLMULQDQ
>  	case RTE_NET_CRC_SSE42:
> -		handlers = handlers_sse42;
> -		break;
> -#elif defined ARM64_NEON_PMULL
> +		if (rte_cpu_get_flagname_enabled(rte_cpu_arch_x86,
> +				"RTE_CPUFLAG_SSE4_2")) {

Why the CPU flags strings are prefixed with RTE_CPUFLAG_?



  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-01 19:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-29 15:41 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Enhance CPU flag support Bruce Richardson
2019-05-29 15:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] build: fix quoting on RTE_ARCH string value Bruce Richardson
2019-05-29 15:53   ` Luca Boccassi
2019-05-29 15:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] config/arm: fix missing define for arm platforms Bruce Richardson
2019-05-29 15:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] eal: allow checking CPU flags by name Bruce Richardson
2019-06-27 13:22   ` David Marchand
2019-06-28 12:40     ` Bruce Richardson
2019-06-28 13:34       ` David Marchand
2019-05-29 15:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] net: replace ifdefs with runtime branches Bruce Richardson
2019-07-01 19:30   ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2019-07-01 20:41     ` Bruce Richardson
2019-07-04 20:20       ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-07-08 17:24         ` David Christensen
2019-06-27 12:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Enhance CPU flag support Ananyev, Konstantin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2785804.vqP48ztxbI@xps \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).