From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D75A0C4A; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 11:53:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F03F410DF; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 11:53:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0822D4069C for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 11:53:01 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10038"; a="189158048" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,222,1620716400"; d="scan'208,217";a="189158048" Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Jul 2021 02:53:00 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,222,1620716400"; d="scan'208,217";a="564382110" Received: from amandee1-mobl.gar.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.213.106.188]) ([10.213.106.188]) by fmsmga001-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Jul 2021 02:52:58 -0700 To: Raslan Darawsheh , Andrew Rybchenko , "dev@dpdk.org" References: <20210617091716.2354978-1-rasland@nvidia.com> <9af41a93-ae9a-2aeb-0dcd-ae0129bf55b2@intel.com> From: "Singh, Aman Deep" Message-ID: <27e660ee-d225-2ba3-0db1-c3da9cfdbeed@intel.com> Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 15:22:47 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-GB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] ethdev: add new ext hdr for gtp psc X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Thanks Raslan for the rfc link.The structure order for RTE_BIG_ENDIAN seems ok. I doubt for RTE_LITTLE_ENDIAN case, if there is a need to reverse the order of fields, as we are using uint8_t only. If you have already tested on x86 then it should be fine ? Regards Aman On 7/6/2021 7:54 PM, Raslan Darawsheh wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Sorry for missing this mail, for some reason it was missed in my inbox, > This is the link to this rfc: > https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/38_series/38.415/38415-g30.zip > > > Kindest regards, > Raslan Darawsheh > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: dev On Behalf Of Andrew Rybchenko >> Sent: Thursday, July 1, 2021 5:06 PM >> To: Singh, Aman Deep ; dev@dpdk.org >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] ethdev: add new ext hdr for gtp psc >> >> Hi Raslan, >> >> could you reply, please. >> >> Andrew. >> >> On 6/22/21 10:27 AM, Singh, Aman Deep wrote: >>> Hi Raslan, >>> >>> Can you please provide link to this RFC 38415-g30 I just had some >>> doubt on byte-order conversion as per RFC 1700 >>> >>> >>> Regards >>> Aman