From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
To: "Li, Miao" <miao.li@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Xia, Chenbo" <chenbo.xia@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] net/vhost: add queue status check
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 09:36:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <27f25ca9-0c52-5398-d34d-139bbee3f221@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CO1PR11MB49009CFCAD0A5198F12CC0ABEE9C9@CO1PR11MB4900.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On 11/19/21 07:30, Li, Miao wrote:
> Hi
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2021 5:36 PM
>> To: Li, Miao <miao.li@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
>> Cc: Xia, Chenbo <chenbo.xia@intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] net/vhost: add queue status check
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/16/21 10:34, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/16/21 17:44, Miao Li wrote:
>>>> This patch adds queue status check to make sure that vhost monitor
>>>> address will not be got until the link between backend and frontend
>>> s/got/gone/?
>>>> up and the packets are allowed to be queued.
>>>
>>> It needs a fixes tag.
>
> If we don't add this check, rte_vhost_get_monitor_addr will return -EINVAL when check if dev is null. But before return, get_device() will be called and print error log "device not found". So we want to add this check and return -EINVAL before call rte_vhost_get_monitor_addr. If we don't add this check, the vhost monitor address will also not be got but vhost will print error log continuously. It have no function impact, so I think it is not a fix.
>
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Miao Li <miao.li@intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c | 2 ++
>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c
>>>> b/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c
>>>> index 070f0e6dfd..9d600054d8 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c
>>>> @@ -1415,6 +1415,8 @@ vhost_get_monitor_addr(void *rx_queue, struct
>>>> rte_power_monitor_cond *pmc)
>>>> int ret;
>>>> if (vq == NULL)
>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>> + if (unlikely(rte_atomic32_read(&vq->allow_queuing) == 0))
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>
>> Also, EINVAL might not be the right return value here.
>
> I don't know which return value will be better. Do you have any suggestions? Thanks!
>
>>
>>> How does it help?
>>> What does prevent allow_queuing to become zero between the check and the
>>> call to rte_vhost_get_monitor_addr?
>
> This check will prevent vhost to print error log continuously.
You mean, it will prevent it most of the time, as there is still a
window where it can happen, if allow_queueing is set between is check
and the call to rte_vhost_get_monitor_addr.
>>>
>>> I think you need to implement the same logic as in eth_vhost_rx(), i.e.
>>> check allow_queueing, set while_queueing, check allow_queueing, do your
>>> stuff and clear while_queuing.
>
> I think the while_queuing is unnecessary because we only read the value in vq and this API will only be called as a callback of RX.
>
> Thanks,
> Miao
>
>>>
>>>> ret = rte_vhost_get_monitor_addr(vq->vid, vq->virtqueue_id,
>>>> &vhost_pmc);
>>>> if (ret < 0)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Maxime
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-31 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-16 16:44 Miao Li
2021-11-16 9:34 ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-11-16 9:36 ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-11-19 6:30 ` Li, Miao
2022-01-31 8:36 ` Maxime Coquelin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=27f25ca9-0c52-5398-d34d-139bbee3f221@redhat.com \
--to=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=chenbo.xia@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=miao.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).