From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93DD6A0A0F; Sun, 4 Jul 2021 03:38:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419CC40040; Sun, 4 Jul 2021 03:38:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225B94003F for ; Sun, 4 Jul 2021 03:38:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7133B5C00A9; Sat, 3 Jul 2021 21:38:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 03 Jul 2021 21:38:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh=h+W8yfy70A47a R41I9dqlhhk35sBSj44hJlx/ddxcrk=; b=pcZprDxodrtdxb/7PxioScIxxQQoJ TyOMFsVY1QJYxxitBkZZZCZRkDR5G8bGW+HqJnjYrk5DkXNPt3tENjkfVUAXeANU kqfNeDL8kZhE6T7aSiCg/AAqa0xy2R02R9y7aiacWEBAjTrzrT16xV1Bbv5txE9Q xjFgN0ekNq9sjqpa6VIeYOvSNl0dO3kqz7P2clU9rTjMgd3rIluGCrKcZSDsxRVh UaQGtSA5t3xU8tn897Vn8deW4Rccae2ueozMGOcr76iIHNHIu4Hm09oAuay5lOPa f+wbSELXSG5ODS7913q9mDMzmSdCmP+iZaiFueezA412Iu7KcwXGLGKKg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=h+W8yf y70A47aR41I9dqlhhk35sBSj44hJlx/ddxcrk=; b=sJEzo4gNx2rZccU38jdElk 41JvkW4npMWRf3cVvEHqVc97R5ywTWK5sQib5nUqHXeEoWSgw+LVdnIrjK8D5/qY A04kCAq66PRlxMPJyrUNXobRpeLKZnJDzpcPT1GDKLZrFDks7hO7fimfX+o9fH+L EXcVwNzyxII9982V1WOvpcUoYmL1qn5Baa4oP3RphqaLOKpDX0/U+DxihBPsBSNN 4MFfE9gG11oCRnATuHRrVrUbv1bxDOtjnCylrV/dSSJBaVr4OkSeNOTeWQRvuRZz yLPaF1ryoCm65EqSAiuIf9y871g5S1i6Z37Ccl6/K4YISLnNI59LHOEJfyAgZUjg == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrfeejuddggeeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkggfgtgesthfuredttd dtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhho nhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeujeduhedtjeegueejhfetje egtdfgheeuueeivdeuhfeijefhffdufeegjefhkeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt necurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvg ht X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sat, 3 Jul 2021 21:38:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: ferruh.yigit@intel.com, andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru, keesang.song@amd.com, anatoly.burakov@intel.com, david.marchand@redhat.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, David Christensen Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2021 03:38:36 +0200 Message-ID: <2863796.yO5TXMfXnl@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: [dpdk-dev] NUMA node/socket X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" There are some mix between NUMA node and socket IDs in DPDK. Examples: * rte_eth_dev_socket_id() returns the NUMA node. * rte_malloc use sockets to allocate the memory Is it critical?