Re: [dpdk-dev] Best Practices for PMD Verification before Upstream Requests

[Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>]

2016-08-17 08:34, Shepard Siegel:
> Atomic Rules is new to the DPDK community. We attended the DPDK Summit last
> week and received terrific advice and encouragement. We are developing a
> DPDK PMD for our Arkville product which is a DPDK-aware data mover, capable
> of marshaling packets between FPGA/ASIC gates with AXI interfaces on one
> side, and the DPDK API/ABI on the other. Arkville plus a MAC looks like a
> line-rate-agnostic bare-bones L2 NIC. We have testpmd and our first DPDK
> applications running using our early-alpha Arkville PMD.

Welcome :)

Any release targeted for upstream support?

> This post is to ask of the DPDK community what tests, regressions,
> check-lists or similar verification assets we might work through before
> starting the process to upstream our code? We know device-specific PMDs are
> rather cloistered and unlikely to interfere; but still, others must have
> managed to find a way to fail with even an L2 baseline NIC.  We don’t want
> to needlessly repeat those mistakes. Any DPDK-specific collateral that we
> can use to verify and validate our codes before attempting to upstream them
> would be greatly appreciated. To the DPDK PMD developers, what can you
> share so that we are more aligned with your regressions? To the DPDK
> application developers, what’s your top gripe we might try to avoid in our
> Arkville L2 baseline PMD?

Are you aware of the DPDK test suite?
	http://dpdk.org/doc/dts/gsg/
	http://dpdk.org/browse/tools/dts/

I don't know how efficient it is for PMD developers and who use it.
I guess that DTS authors would like to have more feedbacks.