From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67BEBA0548; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 20:33:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25632416FB; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 20:33:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from new3-smtp.messagingengine.com (new3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.229]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49984410FD for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 20:33:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB1675803CD; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 14:33:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 09 Jul 2021 14:33:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh=4VGNpzhyBkyEL Anfkmlp5HfzJlT44eGaHaOsUQO4VtI=; b=ClDicW6JZ/syp5v51mphutffzSB1L hho8A8VhOI/L9rwXRMWBwyOdseSaGIqshbVQOLvb5NMKgHWngTjW1rAbHK5Kmjp/ 3IjMMVQDMfNYVF4aqRuJZ1xjtPE34WAkJbj7Hz695L+D3yvLu2Zl6Cfuabo+NFN2 O+OT45Ys4TUNwcpwQhr03J2Lk63JiEm1Xr/XmUA3szy/7ktnMxrzCSAWfWjzhQqK APUooT8YkEu85yTtCT7Y0BN6qjBpvfs7KBJhduKV6XB0Z/a9tOzboNTUpT9WX4eq xCrK5G2vscRI2ZpDy7jBRNVLwlczXtjjb8tgxfX6HD98uq1vczIleA/iA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=4VGNpz hyBkyELAnfkmlp5HfzJlT44eGaHaOsUQO4VtI=; b=VmNIUpSaTjtbTIBjnv+14X IoelWbRmzp82PTT9f7yzU5LlNstuJLHlusMKm52nMWN902FtJmaah6DTOKUG/GkY +BDkCUY7IR7rjgM5kSVkZsHDhlrpIwLqjbzDRL+qMpPsM8RKFZT2sr0Gy9MAY4dB i7FkgMz9mfnsl//IGZEPMj46x4tofpcBNAqGiWa//HhStmgOOZ5ZIOMMLksM8FIr 0541BbpM7HmBeMHV176yMttiU9CXn8i2YVXKGYtvh9aTHQnp48SIT+y3vySa9mVk prE5mGO71t/ri7NCcDK/ULBuEMp3Q+Tf5FhI6OrThAd20msMyhlU+94mcBluyJow == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrtdeigdduvddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkggfgtgesthfuredttd dtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhho nhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeujeduhedtjeegueejhfetje egtdfgheeuueeivdeuhfeijefhffdufeegjefhkeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt necurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvg ht X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 14:33:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: david.marchand@redhat.com, ktraynor@redhat.com, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, rasland@nvidia.com, ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com, honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, aconole@redhat.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, mdr@ashroe.eu Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2021 20:33:28 +0200 Message-ID: <2874531.2S3dPSLiCe@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: [dpdk-dev] RHEL 7 support X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi, I would like to open a discussion about RHEL 7 support in DPDK. How long do we want to support it in new DPDK versions? Can we drop RHEL 7 support starting DPDK 21.11? If we decide to drop RHEL 7 support, does it mean we can generally use standard C11 atomics? What other benefits or impacts can you think about?