From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C0B2C8 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 15:07:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5848520A4F; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 09:07:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 20 Jun 2017 09:07:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=m5oabrLwb1A3y+m pOeaZgj2GZdl/fuZbos184cl3KKE=; b=QZDLlTuOdZoVMsP+na7mvw4BpRziZqD 8tGWX8Yntl51Nhdz+15xaI3NIm3+d/goATrzYqvlB2f6JtMHxdQ/Q+MdIiTakZZG wvrZoxmiXGgtowHTZDksNLoj+uGxfzEMOMcKSaZByOoGbtaCcGfUfUDKI9FDDuLp dOxIYQddLd+U= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=m5oabrLwb1A3y+mpOeaZgj2GZdl/fuZbos184cl3KKE=; b=ohjiHoel tu2LeFmdXhiJPbFI5MpFe9ep5coXz+y0mHRZRj0gbKlf6wsBNpV3s2IyWBbLPM/u G7PCgYvAkuZ9CsyJN+KFpkLTU6kf53wnlardZ4Ma1rg/bktzBnrJ8i6cNd6O2PG8 F+PPjTLMvMjdvXAHNNMjNhZsA2hnPdCoveMnKQFkj5cszLZqgW0tmSpZe1yvDQIi puiUyu+AGSygrL6XG6XlTcMtBotKDseY54H3lpr7kt7OWb3P3RM6oR79rBTYaTkm PozlwoL99f1zUx7gHmKmBdzzAHx4sWDDnv0JblZz+wDGECauxVKDe6CI6Ml6lmUu CqDPvMprRuYB9Q== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: OrMkaciLKCMnET5DwPfTOH7/pOpB3a2qy1EDJhZ2fXOs 1497964032 Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 00F247E7B1; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 09:07:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ilya Maximets Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Hemant Agrawal , Sergio Gonzalez Monroy , Bruce Richardson , David Marchand , Heetae Ahn , Yuanhan Liu , Jianfeng Tan , Neil Horman , Yulong Pei Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 15:07:11 +0200 Message-ID: <2889333.ySLvsRWIRF@xps> In-Reply-To: <3ccc716f-27ae-55a4-0751-c60b5329d7a4@nxp.com> References: <1496736832-835-1-git-send-email-i.maximets@samsung.com> <3ccc716f-27ae-55a4-0751-c60b5329d7a4@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] Balanced allocation of hugepages X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 13:07:13 -0000 19/06/2017 13:10, Hemant Agrawal: > >>> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 02:21:58PM +0300, Ilya Maximets wrote: > >>>> So, there are 2 option: > >>>> > >>>> 1. Return back config option RTE_LIBRTE_EAL_NUMA_AWARE_HUGEPAGES > >>>> from the first version of the patch and disable it by default. > >>>> > >>>> 2. Keep patch as it is now and make everyone install libnuma > >>>> for successful build. > > > +1 for option 1 > It will be a issue and undesired dependency for SoCs, not supporting > NUMA architecture. > > It can be added to the config, who desired to use it by default. Yes I agree, it cannot be a dependency for architectures which do not support NUMA. Please can we rework the patch so that only one node is assumed if NUMA is disabled for the architecture?