From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9FD02B87 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:26:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F086231B5; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 12:26:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 23 Jan 2019 12:26:39 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=v3WhKiootsj70avzWgY3gb/+nfRLp9EIhdsrQVs3WLc=; b=hhkXFiMP2AxS UKKvFzN5OKbYUhQQuSfj6SyzPfzF1mn0o8fhntyJXKQMMoC9wS7nvwEZ1dR7ApZK Tc3o/xDzCbOiEWhsH8MD6ixXGGyuQ1/m6CtVp+R2QzYDb4cxJq3/sbMcL58guldq M3vWhqJ378wXWPbyrYH+DV+c/m9AQag= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=v3WhKiootsj70avzWgY3gb/+nfRLp9EIhdsrQVs3W Lc=; b=C+oRwmiKdBjUstbR92K/qTEoT76RP1+c/0oIasWVKi2dO41qiO5g0Fu/d v1s+VssRYjxUNrVqI68mCIXxXenYKJRgf7Nd4qcduSzE7yqV98JwxN2Ukqtk5wd5 GiLFwlYgZL6NM5cx0aKA8pdX5zdFsc8a8h4qx9wAs/RPjEETw30N3v1a4IPJhdmr GYYvwRyrcnRGceMEHs7HbM3H+GkV4/lplhClipBeORwDPrFbrfqST7owP8dv8jhZ wk5C5v5m7TkleYcqbQ5P0DGK0m0l4q57mtpuJhpHLLejaxVJftoOzo0AntLcFVt3 GEnL+FN6vFN6KDBCbegpYsdpTU2HA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtledriedtgddutddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfquhhtnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucef tddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvffufffkjg hfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcu oehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucffohhmrghinhepughpughkrd horhhgnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhf rhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiii gvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CC59110310; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 12:26:37 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" Cc: "Yigit, Ferruh" , Ravi Kerur , dpdk-dev , "Mcnamara, John" Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:26:36 +0100 Message-ID: <2922307.MMPdoxV78S@xps> In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258010D907202@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1489008729-28784-2-git-send-email-rkerur@gmail.com> <2510395.XNuST6rEQr@xps> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258010D907202@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/3] examples/l3fwd: merge l3fwd-acl code into l3fwd X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 17:26:40 -0000 23/01/2019 18:20, Ananyev, Konstantin: > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net] > > 23/01/2019 17:32, Ferruh Yigit: > > > On 3/10/2017 8:58 PM, rkerur at gmail.com (Ravi Kerur) wrote: > > > > This patchset merges l3fwd-acl and l3fwd code into common directory. > > > > Adds config file read option to build LPM and EM tables. > > > > > > > > Ravi Kerur (3): > > > > examples/l3fwd: merge l3fwd-acl code into l3fwd > > > > examples/l3fwd: add config file support for lpm > > > > examples/l3fwd: add config file support for exact > > > > > > Hi Ravi, > > > > > > These l3fwd patches are in patchwork for a long time, I am updating the patchset > > > as rejected, if it is still relevant please send a new version on top of latest > > > repo. > > > > > > Sorry for any inconvenience caused. > > > > > > For reference patches: > > > https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/21696/ > > > https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/21695/ > > > https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/21697/ > > > > > > doc one: > > > https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/24211/ > > > > This work was going in the right direction. > > > > Totally agree. > > > Konstantin, as the maintainer of the ACL library, > > do you think it is worth to keep this example as standalone or merged? > > My vote is definitely for merging. > That would give us single l3fwd app with 3 different routing methods > (lpm, hash, acl) selectable at run-time, plus routing tables in config file. OK, so we just need to find a volunteer. Ravi started the work a long time ago and did not receive enough review. I'm afraid he's not available anymore.