From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "Wang, Haiyue" <haiyue.wang@intel.com>
Cc: "Daly, Jeff" <jeffd@silicom-usa.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
Stephen Douthit <stephend@silicom-usa.com>,
qi.z.zhang@intel.com, john.mcnamara@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/ixgbe: Treat 1G Cu SFPs as 1G SX on the X550 devices
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 14:18:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2937496.687JKscXgg@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR11MB34955548EB65B221230BA5ECF7EF9@BYAPR11MB3495.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
14/04/2022 14:13, Wang, Haiyue:
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> > 14/04/2022 03:31, Wang, Haiyue:
> > > From: jeffd@silicom-usa.com <jeffd@silicom-usa.com>
> > > > From: Stephen Douthit <stephend@silicom-usa.com>
> > > >
> > > > 1G Cu SFPs are not officially supported on the X552/X553 family of devices
> > > > but treat them as 1G SX modules since they usually work. Print a warning
> > > > though since support isn't validated, similar to what already happens for
> > > > other unofficially supported SFPs enabled via the allow_unsupported_sfps
> > > > parameter inherited from the mainline Linux driver.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Douthit <stephend@silicom-usa.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Daly <jeffd@silicom-usa.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_x550.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> > > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_x550.c b/drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_x550.c
> > > > index 8810d1658e..8d1bc6c80d 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_x550.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_x550.c
> > > > @@ -1538,9 +1538,21 @@ STATIC s32 ixgbe_supported_sfp_modules_X550em(struct ixgbe_hw *hw, bool
> > *linear)
> > >
> > > NACK.
> > >
> > > As for 1G Cu SFP treating it as 1G SX, some 1G-Base-T SFP modules require the use
> > > of RX_ILOS and some Intel Ethernet products don't support that.
> >
> > So what is the solution?
> >
> > > And the DPDK keeps the same design with kernel.
> >
> > It should not be a justification for limiting DPDK features.
>
> Um, this is upstream version driver to keep the same behavior.
>
> There are also some kind of custom release ...
I don't understand.
Upstream DPDK (and Linux) must support a maximum of hardware and setup.
Why rejecting adding such compatibility?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-14 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-07 22:34 jeffd
2022-04-13 14:21 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-05-20 0:14 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2022-05-20 18:02 ` Jeff Daly
2022-05-23 5:36 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2022-05-23 14:13 ` Jeff Daly
2022-05-23 23:22 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2022-05-25 15:23 ` Jeff Daly
2022-05-26 0:28 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2022-04-14 1:31 ` Wang, Haiyue
2022-04-14 9:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-04-14 12:13 ` Wang, Haiyue
2022-04-14 12:18 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2022-04-14 15:11 ` Jeff Daly
2022-04-14 15:43 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-04-14 17:06 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-04-19 9:11 ` Morten Brørup
2022-04-19 12:32 ` Wang, Haiyue
2022-04-15 1:10 ` Wang, Haiyue
2022-05-26 20:43 ` [PATCH v2] " Jeff Daly
2022-05-29 22:49 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2022-05-30 13:32 ` Jeff Daly
2022-05-30 13:50 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2022-05-31 12:30 ` Jeff Daly
2022-05-31 13:38 ` Zhang, Qi Z
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2937496.687JKscXgg@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=haiyue.wang@intel.com \
--cc=jeffd@silicom-usa.com \
--cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=stephend@silicom-usa.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).