From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55667A053A; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 12:02:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B040C1C00D; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 12:02:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36D5C255 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 12:02:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121BFFAA; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 06:02:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 04 Aug 2020 06:02:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh=QfkHI2titcDrE WNQa/pK81sRdA0YeOKeu3SLSzjdKzc=; b=NNfpn7AP/jB5ZzfuzBA2u0ZkUJY3i xYfCybe7psqPwh1UPsGRzpoHLDaitJidpn5YeuqVn7kFPyYgg7UfD4opuZkiHQbp oRDq64vCcuAdWyASNG3L1nwEYMrA1KipZFREkAU+rJ0Pszyi5TrGutYOoKdPFXB9 40SmazsC9Nj6wcJTe8YHZhen34RVOCy7QyBvB5JQc0Xmoje0t8cupoMEeZ1NTKmN zxTou0CQhDo4Y2TSiXvatJTG18Su3w+yotJ5JJF5nHjbQVNBD+Gp2SwSSC2yCmGw FojCKNjOJ8PBkH71d+X5MZMRzdm9Sj4X6UsJRreUZn9eWf7qALOTSuSkQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=QfkHI2 titcDrEWNQa/pK81sRdA0YeOKeu3SLSzjdKzc=; b=ObjPkf+XXhxVevhrUyDfKU fPQWKiPcQVWHrDtdZiEreL0DQ3DrDfPg6U2ziNPjMGlRrJyayWZcTYNBd/pSxk2g MSuBboswL+P87ru5Qc/+aiOo6IJia1h1mVZVD7zccVIvBvh14AnjRQAbg1/IFiVj wKT2uwSNe2fjUaEWUSC26pEv/N0tHm5xOyc3N30YouRYEeINGjj6ixtlWA8NWF5s 6wCSmlJaIu8+SqBKhpTBS+9oEXrCDT0W8F0sU6XRiTPzCtiayOXoEB1RuaDBD+Vm lQCsGXwGw5QmzJjIcZaemhLfqLvH62rkXRHMekBMqqXanqS6+7ZpOngPhM4fqruw == X-ME-Sender: <xms:HTIpX4-ZyzQsWCQP5qADenklCxc8vBsjRbfd3G-T9pbWu5Fz2KOfLQ> X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrjeeigddvfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhephffvufffkfgggfgtsehtufertddttd dvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhn jhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepueejudehtdejgeeujefhteejge dtgfehueeuiedvuefhieejhfffudefgeejhfeknecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedr udekgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpe hthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:HTIpXwv4cEAeRi9ayzBDQMjJ600IH3XSeNc6XoHyalcJJu_WJ_Cvpw> <xmx:HTIpX-DWdxpEAv8-vSDOa_i2X6KtdEljRMOTdPHaK6WyBelBrIykIg> <xmx:HTIpX4cpd4u6c9eBNfqh5b0lT0z2H14PX1XwX6Ioii49LkIGjCnp6A> <xmx:HTIpX0YB-pbX_3E4yIFTTqA_yTKdCYCbcQLCOZQX8dfRUcIAbexYjg> Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B1A7730600B9; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 06:02:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> To: ferruh.yigit@intel.com, arybchenko@solarflare.com Cc: dev@dpdk.org Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 12:02:03 +0200 Message-ID: <2943505.b7sj8NLL2l@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: [dpdk-dev] discussion about VLAN API X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> Hi, We have a quite complex API for VLAN filter/push/pop, per port, per queue or per flow. These are the old per-port functions: rte_eth_dev_vlan_filter rte_eth_dev_set_vlan_strip_on_queue rte_eth_dev_set_vlan_ether_type rte_eth_dev_set_vlan_offload rte_eth_dev_get_vlan_offload rte_eth_dev_set_vlan_pvid In rte_eth_dev_data: struct rte_vlan_filter_conf vlan_filter_conf In rte_eth_txmode struct: uint16_t pvid; hw_vlan_reject_tagged : 1, hw_vlan_reject_untagged : 1, hw_vlan_insert_pvid : 1; Configurartion flags: ETH_VLAN_STRIP_OFFLOAD ETH_VLAN_FILTER_OFFLOAD ETH_VLAN_EXTEND_OFFLOAD ETH_QINQ_STRIP_OFFLOAD RX offload capabilities: DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_STRIP DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_FILTER DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_EXTEND DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_QINQ_STRIP TX offload capabilities: DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_INSERT Types: ETH_VLAN_TYPE_UNKNOWN ETH_VLAN_TYPE_INNER ETH_VLAN_TYPE_OUTER rte_flow configuration: RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_VLAN RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_OF_POP_VLAN RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_OF_PUSH_VLAN RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_OF_SET_VLAN_VID RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_OF_SET_VLAN_PCP What can be done to simplify this mess? Wouldn't it be simpler to keep only rte_flow?