From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A4A75592 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 16:46:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96E42236B; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 10:46:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 18 Feb 2019 10:46:40 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=YGsrTacAMMIaSG1/qHq8F4CDfGwSobGGVtKb969OCdU=; b=jlMjUZQWfA1S RvFir3ogFfnUJ+vbC5sGZpuNiGRVqn1XfhvbbcO47IgOBeVBT5iG4jCdTTl+mZKJ NSOZWHSJKCTCe0+f9tL44ziWA0eP8scZ/PX2HmdJdz1LOpQkOxgBgarQDT07guiF JSp1U7AV/wQOXflVbOpIti+egzAOuLA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=YGsrTacAMMIaSG1/qHq8F4CDfGwSobGGVtKb969OC dU=; b=XROmgjopMmwQlnnH8sPuvUJMw/B6EA1f6iACNt6pYIfG1kmI4CImBCmnb SDex/DnLH3eYVx06x+8k66EGnt8d+W74uBw7J9qSn/aHEHwqJw4PNUnbyuyINVdD 9tygFkSfOiOqFLOYwIxEMKTozF0BX+KGXqHdLJnPo1BRVu5ykTg+XHaIEMA9J9uP bxCM+p/jrX4yXzWlrEBzxw/xLBMMc2Hs7Xy7BoioeI+4fDX/ujh8Y8YoNhInBDo9 KYmBsn0UJc7n+vsX+vG2ylFF9PeDnFpxR0SOFK++G8u+8YL1agYMC3Fs6jBUQsdU 77LltGfe7Pu5qy7+er8t65JhhyxuQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedutddrtddugdegleculddtuddrgedtledrtddtmd cutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfhuthen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecukf hppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhh ohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 84EDF10311; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 10:46:39 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: David Wilder Cc: dev@dpdk.org, chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 16:46:38 +0100 Message-ID: <2948898.EADOih85qf@xps> In-Reply-To: <20181116173538.5321-1-dwilder@us.ibm.com> References: <20181116173538.5321-1-dwilder@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3] mem: Fix anonymous mapping on Power9. X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 15:46:41 -0000 Hi, Long time no talk about the IBM Power support status. 16/11/2018 18:35, David Wilder: > --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_18_11.rst > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_18_11.rst > +* IBM Power8 is not supported by this release of DPDK. IBM Power9 is supported. The config file is defconfig_ppc_64-power8-linuxapp-gcc. Given that only Power9 is supported, should we rename it? Is there more changes required to make Power9 working with the latest DPDK?