From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF37FA0547; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:53:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61FF922A274; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:53:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE2BE22A251 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:53:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7757B9CD; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 08:53:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 08:53:01 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= wN8w3+kA3Q0XxXZvmhJJXDMt+WcCTgO0KTSwp4HjWfw=; b=B9+eLDdW/4Cu32F6 zgb+PeYqPUDRQzu1HafmWzNO56flyEizoBftq//lHc3DZRayn8U6artI/wwChfbT PofnrnyZZdBGaRFr2hqVeG3ziOV8d+MJInD4OZoGxQCXC1x2ZH3ZTgTKZ5qUaBq4 3ULIMoTQXh+ypMSoWps4t2dudRhp9qXnfhERWx0MwBx6aSckQMFDg2NMke3np4zH NGGT9BEscXrUBxZgLzib6Rpi3/eKIU23G6n7McX9UsX4GByUFm/22rbiK5bd/EuH QPOK+mimCLabpS3m4WjdzPJK6Hv5JCMtSuGlF6BKwStUMxY2AZwwq+ZfMKblVkUe wYdYcw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=wN8w3+kA3Q0XxXZvmhJJXDMt+WcCTgO0KTSwp4HjW fw=; b=JKCeIZVm7wcBbJ+PCqpnYuIz0mi92Madiuanw6YSgDwpCvKSFaR+xOF3A tqCD5/crZ4N0yX1cSqpAfMnQIkMtlmwhsXv8Fsq99bFz3jq56SUkBx1OuixTNDYq ebEl1OSedI1AVOOL3lcyxF4PXSyo3GvAeE7NGm6oxEgNqya9wZH6hmUDcX3Zlm4V PBTi4zZWMukg0C978p3gYN0soN4Gjf3nNqZ44lEUaLNEfOIict2/Ei0wynjCyLNR YZZVAAEIfCqJvuxlh2mVaemtNv1RKeEcpIwVeBUU2KsFeJXjyxJ9vIxJxkhFZ1gc +Rvoj4wKqNsPpj8lOpZYDrxFiTnHg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledriedugdehjecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpeffvdffjeeuteelfeeileduudeugfetjeelveefkeejfeeigeehteff vdekfeegudenucffohhmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvd dtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhr ohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 42081240066; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 08:53:00 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Bruce Richardson Cc: "Mcnamara, John" , dev@dpdk.org, dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:52:59 +0100 Message-ID: <2955596.pFaKxuZ42Q@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20210212133055.GB970@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20210211120421.3651273-1-john.mcnamara@intel.com> <1973177.ymffIMKg1B@thomas> <20210212133055.GB970@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc: update release notes for 21.02 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 12/02/2021 14:30, Bruce Richardson: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 01:49:27PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 12/02/2021 12:57, Bruce Richardson: > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 12:33:35AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > 11/02/2021 13:08, Mcnamara, John: > > > > > > > > > Thomas, > > > > > > > > > > I didn't remove the "Known Issues" section in case someone else > > > > > adds something to it. If not you can remove it. > > > > > > > > OK, I will remove. > > > > > > Should the new dependency on pyelftools be called out here? Since it's > > > not a common package I think it needs to be emphasised as a new > > > dependency and instructions on how to get it. > > > > What do you think of this update? https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/87883/ > > > I think that is ok as an update for that particular section of "new > features", but the fact is that that new feature introduces a new > dependency for everyone, which means it may be missed for those who aren't > interested in new features. Therefore, I think it should be called out > somewhere else too, to really call attention to it. The reason I would > suggest "known issues" is that it is a section that everyone looking at the > release notes is likely to pay attention to. However, other options, such > as a callout note at the top of the Release Notes i.e not in any particular > section, might work as well. I agree about the need, but I don't think adding something in known issues is visible enough. I will send a v2 with a note at the very beginning of the release notes.