From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2150A04C3; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 14:12:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16CBB2BF9; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 14:12:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FEF591 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 14:12:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD672361F; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 08:12:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 22 Nov 2019 08:12:19 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=9m5W9mjiGNZg4qmdl17g+1dSjfhtLo0Y4OIYCrvbcqw=; b=SHrT9BpxVVc4 /uKNjK9o2RAr0cWfv+GBCRhFPx7QGR45Dg2c4O5tgTu0iBXLGFEGzkdB3sZdQUZC XdU72gvn/8kXRPbAaO5e5+mL0HtpOtLguHUtrM4MwRwDw4H2u96X3xL+vKqKSsP4 /Z8e1IX5fIlVSd56ruSaG9goDBfh7W4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=9m5W9mjiGNZg4qmdl17g+1dSjfhtLo0Y4OIYCrvbc qw=; b=RzQvXsVbs3+0rcA7tobyy43WixZ5qfmDTv3BQnE2dM9vI0rKznApL7ydH vvyi3K+ma1txbdpbojmWTpKYTR0Y3xwE6SVHwVpRqRbdpeshbpn6hEZlTxmb6bSe 1pGbH8RtUhL/bRASWNsk7Lbxrejydp1mtC2DYbekrX+2aqPDkuxl3h3FrTyX2yBw OJlu+FUz6n0++DNRSlTO4bMbSR8U4l2MKSzCJ/972ofLIjLhWjW1b/tBdo1x4maN y9NB98v1a/2a2aII4L5cA5tgzDnr2OkyV3FXZzfDIvaDA7+P9DUX/5oo6D6hr0Rw muDA/drQ2DieFk1+JLE+Hsvr0DfOg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrudehgedggeejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecukf hppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhh ohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3931380062; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 08:12:17 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: David Marchand , dev@dpdk.org, stephen@networkplumber.org, Wenzhuo Lu , Jingjing Wu , Bernard Iremonger , Andrew Rybchenko Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 14:12:14 +0100 Message-ID: <29706985.E09nPtnjEF@xps> In-Reply-To: <67802f2c-974d-482f-9d25-008202d911e0@intel.com> References: <20191121151256.20613-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> <20191122104323.28992-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> <67802f2c-974d-482f-9d25-008202d911e0@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: reduce memory consumption X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 22/11/2019 13:24, Ferruh Yigit: > On 11/22/2019 10:43 AM, David Marchand wrote: > > diff --git a/devtools/test-null.sh b/devtools/test-null.sh > > index 9f9a459f76..6e5b1ad529 100755 > > --- a/devtools/test-null.sh > > +++ b/devtools/test-null.sh > > @@ -25,6 +25,6 @@ else > > fi > > > > (sleep 1 && echo stop) | > > -$testpmd -c $coremask --no-huge -m 150 \ > > +$testpmd -c $coremask --no-huge -m 20 \ > > $libs --vdev net_null1 --vdev net_null2 $eal_options -- \ > > --no-mlockall --total-num-mbufs=2048 $testpmd_options -ia > > What do you think to separate this part, and go with first version of the patchset? > > And I am not sure if we should update at all, what is the benefit? The benefit it to test that there is no anormal memory needs. > Also script fails after update, because of the additional physical devices and > their memory requirement, it is possible to make it run with additional testpmd > argument but fails by default. This test is supposed to be for null devices only. Why are you trying to add physical devices? Oh wait, we miss an option -w 0 to be in whitelist mode?