From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 136E41094 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 17:43:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Jan 2017 08:43:13 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,240,1477983600"; d="scan'208";a="213972271" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.38]) ([10.237.220.38]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Jan 2017 08:43:12 -0800 To: Alejandro Lucero , dev@dpdk.org, Thomas Monjalon References: <1484308202-5198-1-git-send-email-alejandro.lucero@netronome.com> From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: <29aed2ee-78a9-05d5-b684-01f7b62d10f9@intel.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 16:43:11 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1484308202-5198-1-git-send-email-alejandro.lucero@netronome.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] config: build nfp pmd support by default X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 16:43:14 -0000 On 1/13/2017 11:50 AM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > Because using a NFP PMD requires specific BSP installed, the PMD > support was not the default option before. This was just for making > people aware of such dependency, since there is no need for such a > BSP for just compiling DPDK with NFP PMD support. Although NFP will compile fine, as far as I understand BSP dependency is still there. Thomas, What do you think, is compilation enough to be enabled by default? > > Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero <...>