From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>, Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
Cc: xiaoyun.li@intel.com, "Min Hu (Connor)" <humin29@huawei.com>,
dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: support the query of link flow ctrl info
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 09:05:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <29c696ff-f737-12eb-4d9a-2c84ab24c1b5@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <baf37486-eaf2-6eb6-2c94-7566efced165@intel.com>
On 4/21/2021 8:56 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 4/21/2021 7:18 AM, Huisong Li wrote:
>> Hi Kevin,
>>
>> Thank you for your review.
>>
>> This patchset has been applied to dpdk-next-net/main. I will send a new patch
>> to fix it.
>>
>> Your suggestion is better. I intend to use the following format:
>>
>> ********************* Flow control info for port 0 *********************
>> FC mode:
>> Rx pause: off
>> Tx pause: off
>> Autoneg: on
>> Pause time: 0x680
>> High waterline: 0x80
>> Low waterline: 0x40
>> Send XON: on
>> Forward MAC control frames: off
>> *********************************** End ********************************
>>
>
> I missed the outstanding comments from Kevin, I will drop the patch from
> next-net, we can proceed with next version.
>
v2 dropped from tree, patchwork status updated. Please send v3.
>>
>> 在 2021/4/19 23:30, Kevin Traynor 写道:
>>> On 15/04/2021 07:46, Min Hu (Connor) wrote:
>>>> From: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>>>>
>>>> This patch supports the query of the link flow control parameter
>>>> on a port.
>>>>
>>>> The command format is as follows:
>>>> show port <port_id> flow_ctrl
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
>>> Hi Connor,
>>>
>>> Just a few minor comments,
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> Kevin.
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 83
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 7 +++
>>>> 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>>>> index 5bf1497..9fa85c4 100644
>>>> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>>>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>>>> @@ -258,6 +258,9 @@ static void cmd_help_long_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>>>> "show port (port_id) fec_mode"
>>>> " Show fec mode of a port.\n\n"
>>>> +
>>>> + "show port <port_id> flow_ctrl"
>>>> + " Show flow control info of a port.\n\n"
>>>> );
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -6863,6 +6866,85 @@ cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_set_allmulti_mode_one = {
>>>> },
>>>> };
>>>> +/* *** GET CURRENT ETHERNET LINK FLOW CONTROL *** */
>>>> +struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show {
>>>> + cmdline_fixed_string_t show;
>>>> + cmdline_fixed_string_t port;
>>>> + portid_t port_id;
>>>> + cmdline_fixed_string_t flow_ctrl;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_lfc_show_show =
>>>> + TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
>>>> + show, "show");
>>>> +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_lfc_show_port =
>>>> + TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
>>>> + port, "port");
>>>> +cmdline_parse_token_num_t cmd_lfc_show_portid =
>>>> + TOKEN_NUM_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
>>>> + port_id, RTE_UINT16);
>>>> +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_lfc_show_flow_ctrl =
>>>> + TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
>>>> + flow_ctrl, "flow_ctrl");
>>>> +
>>>> +static void
>>>> +cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>>>> + __rte_unused struct cmdline *cl,
>>>> + __rte_unused void *data)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show *res = parsed_result;
>>>> + static const char *info_border = "*********************";
>>>> + struct rte_eth_fc_conf fc_conf;
>>>> + bool rx_fc_en = false;
>>>> + bool tx_fc_en = false;
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!rte_eth_dev_is_valid_port(res->port_id)) {
>>> This ^ is already checked in rte_eth_dev_flow_ctrl_get() below. That
>>> said, it's not doing any harm here and you would need to add check for
>>> -ENODEV below if you wanted to tell the user that the port is invalid
>>> so either way is ok IMHO.
>>>
>>>> + printf("Invalid port id %u\n", res->port_id);
>>>> + return;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = rte_eth_dev_flow_ctrl_get(res->port_id, &fc_conf);
>>>> + if (ret != 0) {
>>>> + printf("Failed to get current flow ctrl information: err = %d\n",
>>>> + ret);
>>>> + return;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + if ((fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_RX_PAUSE) || (fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_FULL))
>>> You can remove unnecessary brackets, i.e.
>>> if (fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_RX_PAUSE || fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_FULL)
>>>
>>>
>>>> + rx_fc_en = true;
>>>> + if ((fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_TX_PAUSE) || (fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_FULL))
>>> same comment on brackets
>>>
>>>> + tx_fc_en = true;
>>>> +
>>>> + printf("\n%s Flow control infos for port %-2d %s\n",
>>> s/infos/info/
>>>
>>>> + info_border, res->port_id, info_border);
>>>> + printf("FC mode:\n");
>>> It's better not to introduce a new acronym (even if it's a bit obvious)
>>>
>>>> + printf(" Rx: %s\n", rx_fc_en ? "On" : "Off");
>>>> + printf(" Tx: %s\n", tx_fc_en ? "On" : "Off");
>>>> + printf("FC autoneg status: %s\n", fc_conf.autoneg != 0 ? "On" : "Off");
>>>> + printf("pause_time: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.pause_time);
>>>> + printf("high_water: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.high_water);
>>>> + printf("low_water: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.low_water);
>>>> + printf("Send Xon: %s\n", fc_conf.send_xon ? "On" : "Off");
>>>> + printf("mac ctrl frame fwd: %s\n",
>>>> + fc_conf.mac_ctrl_frame_fwd ? "On" : "Off");
>>> There's a mix of struct member names and descriptions here. I think it's
>>> better to stick to one or the other.
>>>
>>> i.e. currently
>>>
>>> testpmd> show port 0 flow_ctrl
>>>
>>> ********************* Flow control infos for port 0 *********************
>>> FC mode:
>>> Rx: Off
>>> Tx: Off
>>> FC autoneg status: On
>>> pause_time: 0x680
>>> high_water: 0x80
>>> low_water: 0x40
>>> Send Xon: On
>>> Forward MAC control frames: Off
>>>
>>>
>>> Suggestion:
>>>
>>> ********************* Flow control info for port 0 *********************
>>> Rx mode: off
>>> Tx mode: off
>>> Autoneg: on
>>> Pause time: 0x680
>>> High water: 0x80
>>> Low water: 0x40
>>> Send XON: on
>>> Forward MAC control frames: off
>>> *********************************** End ********************************
>>>
>>> As ever, display is subjective, so please take as suggestion, you/others
>>> may have different view.
>>>
>>>
>>>> + printf("\n%s************** End ***********%s\n",
>>>> + info_border, info_border);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_link_flow_control_show = {
>>>> + .f = cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show_parsed,
>>>> + .data = NULL,
>>>> + .help_str = "show port <port_id> flow_ctrl",
>>>> + .tokens = {
>>>> + (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_show,
>>>> + (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_port,
>>>> + (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_portid,
>>>> + (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_flow_ctrl,
>>>> + NULL,
>>>> + },
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> /* *** SETUP ETHERNET LINK FLOW CONTROL *** */
>>>> struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_set_result {
>>>> cmdline_fixed_string_t set;
>>>> @@ -17001,6 +17083,7 @@ cmdline_parse_ctx_t main_ctx[] = {
>>>> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_set_xon,
>>>> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_set_macfwd,
>>>> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_set_autoneg,
>>>> + (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_show,
>>>> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_priority_flow_control_set,
>>>> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_config_dcb,
>>>> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_read_reg,
>>>> diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
>>>> b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
>>>> index e3bfed5..3fca011 100644
>>>> --- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
>>>> +++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
>>>> @@ -1526,6 +1526,13 @@ Where:
>>>> * ``autoneg``: Change the auto-negotiation parameter.
>>>> +show flow ctrl
>>>> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>> +
>>>> +show the link flow control parameter on a port::
>>>> +
>>>> + testpmd> show port <port_id> flow_ctrl
>>>> +
>>>> set pfc_ctrl rx
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>
>>> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-21 8:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-15 6:46 Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-19 2:53 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-04-19 6:40 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-19 8:04 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-04-19 8:28 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-19 8:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-20 0:10 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-20 1:34 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-04-20 1:48 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-19 15:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Kevin Traynor
2021-04-21 6:18 ` Huisong Li
2021-04-21 7:56 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-21 8:05 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2021-04-21 9:42 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-21 9:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-21 11:12 ` Kevin Traynor
2021-04-21 11:36 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-21 11:41 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-21 11:42 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=29c696ff-f737-12eb-4d9a-2c84ab24c1b5@intel.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=humin29@huawei.com \
--cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
--cc=lihuisong@huawei.com \
--cc=xiaoyun.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).