DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yao, Lei A" <lei.a.yao@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Alejandro Lucero <alejandro.lucero@netronome.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "Xu, Qian Q" <qian.q.xu@intel.com>,
	"Lin, Xueqin" <xueqin.lin@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/6] use IOVAs check based on DMA mask
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 08:23:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2DBBFF226F7CF64BAFCA79B681719D954502B75A@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4805099.7RpDHruce7@xps>

Hi, Lucero, Thomas

This patch set will cause deadlock during memory initialization. 
rte_memseg_walk and try_expand_heap both will lock 
the file &mcfg->memory_hotplug_lock. So dead lock will occur. 

#0       rte_memseg_walk
#1  <-rte_eal_check_dma_mask
#2  <-alloc_pages_on_heap
#3  <-try_expand_heap_primary   
#4  <-try_expand_heap

Log as following:
EAL: TSC frequency is ~2494156 KHz
EAL: Master lcore 0 is ready (tid=7ffff7fe3c00;cpuset=[0])
[New Thread 0x7ffff5e0d700 (LWP 330350)]
EAL: lcore 1 is ready (tid=7ffff5e0d700;cpuset=[1])
EAL: Trying to obtain current memory policy.
EAL: Setting policy MPOL_PREFERRED for socket 0
EAL: Restoring previous memory policy: 0

Could you have a check on this? A lot of test cases in our validation 
team fail because of this. Thanks a lot!

BRs
Lei


> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 5:04 AM
> To: Alejandro Lucero <alejandro.lucero@netronome.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/6] use IOVAs check based on DMA
> mask
> 
> 05/10/2018 14:45, Alejandro Lucero:
> > I sent a patchset about this to be applied on 17.11 stable. The memory
> > code has had main changes since that version, so here it is the patchset
> > adjusted to current master repo.
> >
> > This patchset adds, mainly, a check for ensuring IOVAs are within a
> > restricted range due to addressing limitations with some devices. There
> > are two known cases: NFP and IOMMU VT-d emulation.
> >
> > With this check IOVAs out of range are detected and PMDs can abort
> > initialization. For the VT-d case, IOVA VA mode is allowed as long as
> > IOVAs are within the supported range, avoiding to forbid IOVA VA by
> > default.
> >
> > For the addressing limitations known cases, there are just 40(NFP) or
> > 39(VT-d) bits for handling IOVAs. When using IOVA PA, those limitations
> > imply 1TB(NFP) or 512M(VT-d) as upper limits, which is likely enough for
> > most systems. With machines using more memory, the added check will
> > ensure IOVAs within the range.
> >
> > With IOVA VA, and because the way the Linux kernel serves mmap calls
> > in 64 bits systems, 39 or 40 bits are not enough. It is possible to
> > give an address hint with a lower starting address than the default one
> > used by the kernel, and then ensuring the mmap uses that hint or hint plus
> > some offset. With 64 bits systems, the process virtual address space is
> > large enoguh for doing the hugepages mmaping within the supported
> range
> > when those addressing limitations exist. This patchset also adds a change
> > for using such a hint making the use of IOVA VA a more than likely
> > possibility when there are those addressing limitations.
> >
> > The check is not done by default but just when it is required. This
> > patchset adds the check for NFP initialization and for setting the IOVA
> > mode is an emulated VT-d is detected. Also, because the recent patchset
> > adding dynamic memory allocation, the check is also invoked for ensuring
> > the new memsegs are within the required range.
> >
> > This patchset could be applied to stable 18.05.
> 
> Applied, thanks
> 
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-29  8:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-05 12:45 Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-05 12:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/6] mem: add function for checking memsegs IOVAs addresses Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-10  8:56   ` Tu, Lijuan
2018-10-11  9:26     ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-28 21:03   ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-05 12:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/6] mem: use address hint for mapping hugepages Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-29 16:08   ` Dariusz Stojaczyk
2018-10-29 16:40     ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-05 12:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/6] bus/pci: check iommu addressing limitation just once Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-05 12:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/6] bus/pci: use IOVAs dmak mask check when setting IOVA mode Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-05 12:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/6] net/nfp: check hugepages IOVAs based on DMA mask Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-05 12:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/6] net/nfp: support IOVA VA mode Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-28 21:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/6] use IOVAs check based on DMA mask Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-29  8:23   ` Yao, Lei A [this message]
2018-10-29  8:42     ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-29  9:07       ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-29  9:25         ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-29  9:44           ` Yao, Lei A
2018-10-29  9:36       ` Yao, Lei A
2018-10-29  9:48         ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-29 10:11           ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-29 10:15             ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-29 11:39               ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-29 11:46                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-29 12:55                   ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-29 13:18                     ` Yao, Lei A
2018-10-29 13:40                       ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-29 14:18                         ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-29 14:35                           ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-29 18:54                           ` Yongseok Koh
2018-10-29 19:37                             ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-30 10:10                               ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-10-30 10:11                           ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-10-30 10:19                             ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-30  3:20                         ` Lin, Xueqin
2018-10-30  9:41                           ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-30 10:33                             ` Lin, Xueqin
2018-10-30 10:38                               ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-30 12:21                                 ` Lin, Xueqin
2018-10-30 12:37                                   ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-30 14:04                                     ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-30 14:14                                       ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-10-30 14:45                                         ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-30 14:45                                       ` Lin, Xueqin
2018-10-30 14:57                                         ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-30 15:09                                           ` Lin, Xueqin
2018-10-30 10:18                 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-10-30 10:23                   ` Alejandro Lucero
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-07-04 12:53 Alejandro Lucero

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2DBBFF226F7CF64BAFCA79B681719D954502B75A@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=lei.a.yao@intel.com \
    --cc=alejandro.lucero@netronome.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=qian.q.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=xueqin.lin@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).