Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] power: fix make build for power apps

["Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>]

On 08-Jan-21 2:30 PM, David Hunt wrote:
> The power example applications that uses the virtio-serial method of
> communication cannot currently be built with make, and can only be built
> using meson/ninja.
> 
> The guest channel message definitions and functions in guest_channel.h
> are needed by applications and need to be made public.
> 
> This worked pre-20.11, but now with all the meson/ninja changes, making
> these apps externally no longer works. To fix, we need to move the header
> file with the API definitions for the channel commands public, and rename
> the functions accordingly.
> 
> The main change is to rename channel_commands.h to
> rte_power_guest_channel.h so that it gets picked up by the installer and
> copied to /usr/local/include. Other changes include renaming #defines to
> have RTE_ at the beginning instead of CPU_. Finally we refactor the code
> to work with those changes.
> 
> ---
> v2 changes
>    - re-worked from monolithic patch to a 6 patch patchset for easier review
> 
> [PATCH v2 1/6] power: create guest channel public header file
> [PATCH v2 2/6] power: make channel msg functions public
> [PATCH v2 3/6] power: rename public structs
> [PATCH v2 4/6] power: rename defines
> [PATCH v2 5/6] power: add new header file to export list
> [PATCH v2 6/6] power: clean up includes
> 

Just a general question: wouldn't it be better to move this stuff 
entirely into sample app and not bother with keeping it in the library? 
There is precedent - ethtool app has a "library" and an "application" 
part, i think you should be able to move it out of the library and into 
the sample app entirely without too much trouble, as code looks to be 
fairly self-contained.

-- 
Thanks,
Anatoly