Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] security: update session create API

[Lukasz Wojciechowski <l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com>]

Hi Akhil,

comments inline

W dniu 11.10.2020 o 00:11, Akhil Goyal pisze:
> The API ``rte_security_session_create`` takes only single
> mempool for session and session private data. So the
> application need to create mempool for twice the number of
> sessions needed and will also lead to wastage of memory as
> session private data need more memory compared to session.
> Hence the API is modified to take two mempool pointers
> - one for session and one for private data.
> This is very similar to crypto based session create APIs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in V2:
> incorporated comments from Lukasz and David.
>
>   app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_ops.c       |  4 +-
>   app/test-crypto-perf/main.c            | 12 +++--
>   app/test/test_cryptodev.c              | 18 ++++++--
>   app/test/test_ipsec.c                  |  3 +-
>   app/test/test_security.c               | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++------
>   doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_security.rst |  8 +++-
>   doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst   |  7 ---
>   doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_11.rst |  6 +++
>   examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c     | 12 +----
>   examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.c           |  9 ++--
>   lib/librte_security/rte_security.c     |  7 ++-
>   lib/librte_security/rte_security.h     |  4 +-
>   12 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_ops.c b/app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_ops.c
> index 3da835a9c..3a64a2c34 100644
> --- a/app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_ops.c
> +++ b/app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_ops.c
> @@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ cperf_create_session(struct rte_mempool *sess_mp,
>   
>   		/* Create security session */
>   		return (void *)rte_security_session_create(ctx,
> -					&sess_conf, sess_mp);
> +					&sess_conf, sess_mp, priv_mp);
>   	}
>   	if (options->op_type == CPERF_DOCSIS) {
>   		enum rte_security_docsis_direction direction;
> @@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ cperf_create_session(struct rte_mempool *sess_mp,
>   
>   		/* Create security session */
>   		return (void *)rte_security_session_create(ctx,
> -					&sess_conf, priv_mp);
> +					&sess_conf, sess_mp, priv_mp);
>   	}
>   #endif
>   	sess = rte_cryptodev_sym_session_create(sess_mp);
> diff --git a/app/test-crypto-perf/main.c b/app/test-crypto-perf/main.c
> index 62ae6048b..53864ffdd 100644
> --- a/app/test-crypto-perf/main.c
> +++ b/app/test-crypto-perf/main.c
> @@ -156,7 +156,14 @@ cperf_initialize_cryptodev(struct cperf_options *opts, uint8_t *enabled_cdevs)
>   		if (sess_size > max_sess_size)
>   			max_sess_size = sess_size;
>   	}
> -
> +#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_SECURITY
> +	for (cdev_id = 0; cdev_id < rte_cryptodev_count(); cdev_id++) {
> +		sess_size = rte_security_session_get_size(
> +				rte_cryptodev_get_sec_ctx(cdev_id));
> +		if (sess_size > max_sess_size)
> +			max_sess_size = sess_size;
> +	}
> +#endif
>   	/*
>   	 * Calculate number of needed queue pairs, based on the amount
>   	 * of available number of logical cores and crypto devices.
> @@ -247,8 +254,7 @@ cperf_initialize_cryptodev(struct cperf_options *opts, uint8_t *enabled_cdevs)
>   				opts->nb_qps * nb_slaves;
>   #endif
>   		} else
> -			sessions_needed = enabled_cdev_count *
> -						opts->nb_qps * 2;
> +			sessions_needed = enabled_cdev_count * opts->nb_qps;
>   
>   		/*
>   		 * A single session is required per queue pair
> diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
> index ac2a36bc2..4bd9d8aff 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
> @@ -553,9 +553,15 @@ testsuite_setup(void)
>   	unsigned int session_size =
>   		rte_cryptodev_sym_get_private_session_size(dev_id);
>   
> +#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_SECURITY
> +	unsigned int security_session_size = rte_security_session_get_size(
> +			rte_cryptodev_get_sec_ctx(dev_id));
> +
> +	if (session_size < security_session_size)
> +			session_size = security_session_size;
> +#endif
>   	/*
> -	 * Create mempool with maximum number of sessions * 2,
> -	 * to include the session headers
> +	 * Create mempool with maximum number of sessions.
>   	 */
>   	if (info.sym.max_nb_sessions != 0 &&
>   			info.sym.max_nb_sessions < MAX_NB_SESSIONS) {
> @@ -7219,7 +7225,8 @@ test_pdcp_proto(int i, int oop,
>   
>   	/* Create security session */
>   	ut_params->sec_session = rte_security_session_create(ctx,
> -				&sess_conf, ts_params->session_priv_mpool);
> +				&sess_conf, ts_params->session_mpool,
> +				ts_params->session_priv_mpool);
>   
>   	if (!ut_params->sec_session) {
>   		printf("TestCase %s()-%d line %d failed %s: ",
> @@ -7479,7 +7486,8 @@ test_pdcp_proto_SGL(int i, int oop,
>   
>   	/* Create security session */
>   	ut_params->sec_session = rte_security_session_create(ctx,
> -				&sess_conf, ts_params->session_priv_mpool);
> +				&sess_conf, ts_params->session_mpool,
> +				ts_params->session_priv_mpool);
>   
>   	if (!ut_params->sec_session) {
>   		printf("TestCase %s()-%d line %d failed %s: ",
> @@ -7836,6 +7844,7 @@ test_docsis_proto_uplink(int i, struct docsis_test_data *d_td)
>   
>   	/* Create security session */
>   	ut_params->sec_session = rte_security_session_create(ctx, &sess_conf,
> +					ts_params->session_mpool,
>   					ts_params->session_priv_mpool);
>   
>   	if (!ut_params->sec_session) {
> @@ -8011,6 +8020,7 @@ test_docsis_proto_downlink(int i, struct docsis_test_data *d_td)
>   
>   	/* Create security session */
>   	ut_params->sec_session = rte_security_session_create(ctx, &sess_conf,
> +					ts_params->session_mpool,
>   					ts_params->session_priv_mpool);
>   
>   	if (!ut_params->sec_session) {
> diff --git a/app/test/test_ipsec.c b/app/test/test_ipsec.c
> index 79d00d7e0..9ad07a179 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_ipsec.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_ipsec.c
> @@ -632,7 +632,8 @@ create_dummy_sec_session(struct ipsec_unitest_params *ut,
>   	static struct rte_security_session_conf conf;
>   
>   	ut->ss[j].security.ses = rte_security_session_create(&dummy_sec_ctx,
> -					&conf, qp->mp_session_private);
> +					&conf, qp->mp_session,
> +					qp->mp_session_private);
>   
>   	if (ut->ss[j].security.ses == NULL)
>   		return -ENOMEM;
> diff --git a/app/test/test_security.c b/app/test/test_security.c
> index 77fd5adc6..bf6a3e9de 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_security.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_security.c
> @@ -237,24 +237,25 @@ static struct mock_session_create_data {
>   	struct rte_security_session_conf *conf;
>   	struct rte_security_session *sess;
>   	struct rte_mempool *mp;
> +	struct rte_mempool *priv_mp;
>   
>   	int ret;
>   
>   	int called;
>   	int failed;
> -} mock_session_create_exp = {NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, 0, 0, 0};
> +} mock_session_create_exp = {NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, 0, 0, 0};
>   
>   static int
>   mock_session_create(void *device,
>   		struct rte_security_session_conf *conf,
>   		struct rte_security_session *sess,
> -		struct rte_mempool *mp)
> +		struct rte_mempool *priv_mp)
>   {
>   	mock_session_create_exp.called++;
>   
>   	MOCK_TEST_ASSERT_POINTER_PARAMETER(mock_session_create_exp, device);
>   	MOCK_TEST_ASSERT_POINTER_PARAMETER(mock_session_create_exp, conf);
> -	MOCK_TEST_ASSERT_POINTER_PARAMETER(mock_session_create_exp, mp);
> +	MOCK_TEST_ASSERT_POINTER_PARAMETER(mock_session_create_exp, priv_mp);
>   
>   	mock_session_create_exp.sess = sess;
>   
> @@ -502,6 +503,7 @@ struct rte_security_ops mock_ops = {
>    */
>   static struct security_testsuite_params {
>   	struct rte_mempool *session_mpool;
> +	struct rte_mempool *session_priv_mpool;
>   } testsuite_params = { NULL };
>   
>   /**
> @@ -524,7 +526,8 @@ static struct security_unittest_params {
>   	.sess = NULL,
>   };
>   
> -#define SECURITY_TEST_MEMPOOL_NAME "SecurityTestsMempoolName"
> +#define SECURITY_TEST_MEMPOOL_NAME "SecurityTestMp"
> +#define SECURITY_TEST_PRIV_MEMPOOL_NAME "SecurityTestPrivMp"
>   #define SECURITY_TEST_MEMPOOL_SIZE 15
>   #define SECURITY_TEST_SESSION_OBJECT_SIZE sizeof(struct rte_security_session)
>   
> @@ -545,6 +548,22 @@ testsuite_setup(void)
>   			SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
>   	TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(ts_params->session_mpool,
>   			"Cannot create mempool %s\n", rte_strerror(rte_errno));
> +
> +	ts_params->session_priv_mpool = rte_mempool_create(
> +			SECURITY_TEST_PRIV_MEMPOOL_NAME,
> +			SECURITY_TEST_MEMPOOL_SIZE,
> +			rte_security_session_get_size(&unittest_params.ctx),
Call to rte_security_session_get_size() will cause a mockup function 
mock_session_get_size() to be called, which will return 0.
Why do you call this function instead of defining some value for private 
mempool element size?
> +			0, 0, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
> +			SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
> +	if (ts_params->session_priv_mpool == NULL) {
> +		printf("TestCase %s() line %d failed (null): "
> +				"Cannot create priv mempool %s\n",
> +				__func__, __LINE__, rte_strerror(rte_errno));
Instead of printf() use RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL,...). All other messages are 
printed this way. It allows control of error messages if required.
> +		rte_mempool_free(ts_params->session_mpool);
> +		ts_params->session_mpool = NULL;
> +		return TEST_FAILED;
> +	}
> +
>   	return TEST_SUCCESS;
>   }
>   
> @@ -559,6 +578,10 @@ testsuite_teardown(void)
>   		rte_mempool_free(ts_params->session_mpool);
>   		ts_params->session_mpool = NULL;
>   	}
> +	if (ts_params->session_priv_mpool) {
> +		rte_mempool_free(ts_params->session_priv_mpool);
> +		ts_params->session_priv_mpool = NULL;
> +	}
>   }
>   
>   /**
> @@ -659,7 +682,8 @@ ut_setup_with_session(void)
>   	mock_session_create_exp.ret = 0;
>   
>   	sess = rte_security_session_create(&ut_params->ctx, &ut_params->conf,
> -			ts_params->session_mpool);
> +			ts_params->session_mpool,
> +			ts_params->session_priv_mpool);
>   	TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_NOT_NULL(rte_security_session_create,
>   			sess);
>   	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(sess, mock_session_create_exp.sess,
> @@ -701,7 +725,8 @@ test_session_create_inv_context(void)
>   	struct rte_security_session *sess;
>   
>   	sess = rte_security_session_create(NULL, &ut_params->conf,
> -			ts_params->session_mpool);
> +			ts_params->session_mpool,
> +			ts_params->session_priv_mpool);
>   	TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_RET(rte_security_session_create,
>   			sess, NULL, "%p");
>   	TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_CALLS(mock_session_create_exp, 0);
> @@ -725,7 +750,8 @@ test_session_create_inv_context_ops(void)
>   	ut_params->ctx.ops = NULL;
>   
>   	sess = rte_security_session_create(&ut_params->ctx, &ut_params->conf,
> -			ts_params->session_mpool);
> +			ts_params->session_mpool,
> +			ts_params->session_priv_mpool);
>   	TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_RET(rte_security_session_create,
>   			sess, NULL, "%p");
>   	TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_CALLS(mock_session_create_exp, 0);
> @@ -749,7 +775,8 @@ test_session_create_inv_context_ops_fun(void)
>   	ut_params->ctx.ops = &empty_ops;
>   
>   	sess = rte_security_session_create(&ut_params->ctx, &ut_params->conf,
> -			ts_params->session_mpool);
> +			ts_params->session_mpool,
> +			ts_params->session_priv_mpool);
>   	TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_RET(rte_security_session_create,
>   			sess, NULL, "%p");
>   	TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_CALLS(mock_session_create_exp, 0);
> @@ -770,7 +797,8 @@ test_session_create_inv_configuration(void)
>   	struct rte_security_session *sess;
>   
>   	sess = rte_security_session_create(&ut_params->ctx, NULL,
> -			ts_params->session_mpool);
> +			ts_params->session_mpool,
> +			ts_params->session_priv_mpool);
>   	TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_RET(rte_security_session_create,
>   			sess, NULL, "%p");
>   	TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_CALLS(mock_session_create_exp, 0);
> @@ -781,7 +809,7 @@ test_session_create_inv_configuration(void)
>   }
>   
>   /**
> - * Test execution of rte_security_session_create with NULL mp parameter
> + * Test execution of rte_security_session_create with NULL mempools
>    */
>   static int
>   test_session_create_inv_mempool(void)
> @@ -790,7 +818,7 @@ test_session_create_inv_mempool(void)
>   	struct rte_security_session *sess;
>   
>   	sess = rte_security_session_create(&ut_params->ctx, &ut_params->conf,
> -			NULL);
> +			NULL, NULL);
It would be best to add a new testcase for verification of passing NULL 
private mempool.
If you pass NULL as the primary mempool as in this testcase, the 
verification of priv mempool (rte_securitry.c:37) won't ever happen 
because rte_security_session_create() will return in line 36.
>   	TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_RET(rte_security_session_create,
>   			sess, NULL, "%p");
>   	TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_CALLS(mock_session_create_exp, 0);
> @@ -824,7 +852,8 @@ test_session_create_mempool_empty(void)
>   	TEST_ASSERT_MEMPOOL_USAGE(SECURITY_TEST_MEMPOOL_SIZE);
>   
>   	sess = rte_security_session_create(&ut_params->ctx, &ut_params->conf,
> -			ts_params->session_mpool);
> +			ts_params->session_mpool,
> +			ts_params->session_priv_mpool);
>   	TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_RET(rte_security_session_create,
>   			sess, NULL, "%p");
>   	TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_CALLS(mock_session_create_exp, 0);
> @@ -853,10 +882,12 @@ test_session_create_ops_failure(void)
>   	mock_session_create_exp.device = NULL;
>   	mock_session_create_exp.conf = &ut_params->conf;
>   	mock_session_create_exp.mp = ts_params->session_mpool;
> +	mock_session_create_exp.priv_mp = ts_params->session_priv_mpool;
>   	mock_session_create_exp.ret = -1;	/* Return failure status. */
>   
>   	sess = rte_security_session_create(&ut_params->ctx, &ut_params->conf,
> -			ts_params->session_mpool);
> +			ts_params->session_mpool,
> +			ts_params->session_priv_mpool);
>   	TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_RET(rte_security_session_create,
>   			sess, NULL, "%p");
>   	TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_CALLS(mock_session_create_exp, 1);
> @@ -879,10 +910,12 @@ test_session_create_success(void)
>   	mock_session_create_exp.device = NULL;
>   	mock_session_create_exp.conf = &ut_params->conf;
>   	mock_session_create_exp.mp = ts_params->session_mpool;
> +	mock_session_create_exp.priv_mp = ts_params->session_priv_mpool;
>   	mock_session_create_exp.ret = 0;	/* Return success status. */
>   
>   	sess = rte_security_session_create(&ut_params->ctx, &ut_params->conf,
> -			ts_params->session_mpool);
> +			ts_params->session_mpool,
> +			ts_params->session_priv_mpool);
>   	TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_NOT_NULL(rte_security_session_create,
>   			sess);
>   	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(sess, mock_session_create_exp.sess,
> diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_security.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_security.rst
> index 127da2e4f..fdb469d5f 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_security.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_security.rst
> @@ -533,8 +533,12 @@ and this allows further acceleration of the offload of Crypto workloads.
>   
>   The Security framework provides APIs to create and free sessions for crypto/ethernet
>   devices, where sessions are mempool objects. It is the application's responsibility
> -to create and manage the session mempools. The mempool object size should be able to
> -accommodate the driver's private data of security session.
> +to create and manage two session mempools - one for session and other for session
> +private data. The private session data mempool object size should be able to
> +accommodate the driver's private data of security session. The application can get
> +the size of session private data using API ``rte_security_session_get_size``.
> +And the session mempool object size should be enough to accomodate
> +``rte_security_session``.
>   
>   Once the session mempools have been created, ``rte_security_session_create()``
>   is used to allocate and initialize a session for the required crypto/ethernet device.
> diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> index 52f413e21..d956a76e7 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> @@ -164,13 +164,6 @@ Deprecation Notices
>     following the IPv6 header, as proposed in RFC
>     https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=6c464261-31d8d98b-6c47c92e-0cc47a6cba04-7bff9381095a3baf&q=1&e=1d514a47-c7a4-4d29-b9af-8fe8863e27eb&u=https%3A%2F%2Fmails.dpdk.org%2Farchives%2Fdev%2F2020-August%2F177257.html.
>   
> -* security: The API ``rte_security_session_create`` takes only single mempool
> -  for session and session private data. So the application need to create
> -  mempool for twice the number of sessions needed and will also lead to
> -  wastage of memory as session private data need more memory compared to session.
> -  Hence the API will be modified to take two mempool pointers - one for session
> -  and one for private data.
> -
>   * cryptodev: ``RTE_CRYPTO_AEAD_LIST_END`` from ``enum rte_crypto_aead_algorithm``,
>     ``RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_LIST_END`` from ``enum rte_crypto_cipher_algorithm`` and
>     ``RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_LIST_END`` from ``enum rte_crypto_auth_algorithm``
> diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_11.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_11.rst
> index c34ab5493..68b82ae4e 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_11.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_11.rst
> @@ -307,6 +307,12 @@ API Changes
>     ``rte_fpga_lte_fec_configure`` and structure ``fpga_lte_fec_conf`` to
>     ``rte_fpga_lte_fec_conf``.
>   
> +* security: The API ``rte_security_session_create`` is updated to take two
> +  mempool objects one for session and other for session private data.
> +  So the application need to create two mempools and get the size of session
> +  private data using API ``rte_security_session_get_size`` for private session
> +  mempool.
> +
>   
>   ABI Changes
>   -----------
> diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c
> index 60132c4bd..2326089bb 100644
> --- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c
> +++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c
> @@ -2348,12 +2348,8 @@ session_pool_init(struct socket_ctx *ctx, int32_t socket_id, size_t sess_sz)
>   
>   	snprintf(mp_name, RTE_MEMPOOL_NAMESIZE,
>   			"sess_mp_%u", socket_id);
> -	/*
> -	 * Doubled due to rte_security_session_create() uses one mempool for
> -	 * session and for session private data.
> -	 */
>   	nb_sess = (get_nb_crypto_sessions() + CDEV_MP_CACHE_SZ *
> -		rte_lcore_count()) * 2;
> +		rte_lcore_count());
>   	sess_mp = rte_cryptodev_sym_session_pool_create(
>   			mp_name, nb_sess, sess_sz, CDEV_MP_CACHE_SZ, 0,
>   			socket_id);
> @@ -2376,12 +2372,8 @@ session_priv_pool_init(struct socket_ctx *ctx, int32_t socket_id,
>   
>   	snprintf(mp_name, RTE_MEMPOOL_NAMESIZE,
>   			"sess_mp_priv_%u", socket_id);
> -	/*
> -	 * Doubled due to rte_security_session_create() uses one mempool for
> -	 * session and for session private data.
> -	 */
>   	nb_sess = (get_nb_crypto_sessions() + CDEV_MP_CACHE_SZ *
> -		rte_lcore_count()) * 2;
> +		rte_lcore_count());
>   	sess_mp = rte_mempool_create(mp_name,
>   			nb_sess,
>   			sess_sz,
> diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.c b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.c
> index 01faa7ac7..6baeeb342 100644
> --- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.c
> +++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.c
> @@ -117,7 +117,8 @@ create_lookaside_session(struct ipsec_ctx *ipsec_ctx, struct ipsec_sa *sa,
>   			set_ipsec_conf(sa, &(sess_conf.ipsec));
>   
>   			ips->security.ses = rte_security_session_create(ctx,
> -					&sess_conf, ipsec_ctx->session_priv_pool);
> +					&sess_conf, ipsec_ctx->session_pool,
> +					ipsec_ctx->session_priv_pool);
>   			if (ips->security.ses == NULL) {
>   				RTE_LOG(ERR, IPSEC,
>   				"SEC Session init failed: err: %d\n", ret);
> @@ -198,7 +199,8 @@ create_inline_session(struct socket_ctx *skt_ctx, struct ipsec_sa *sa,
>   		}
>   
>   		ips->security.ses = rte_security_session_create(sec_ctx,
> -				&sess_conf, skt_ctx->session_pool);
> +				&sess_conf, skt_ctx->session_pool,
> +				skt_ctx->session_priv_pool);
>   		if (ips->security.ses == NULL) {
>   			RTE_LOG(ERR, IPSEC,
>   				"SEC Session init failed: err: %d\n", ret);
> @@ -378,7 +380,8 @@ create_inline_session(struct socket_ctx *skt_ctx, struct ipsec_sa *sa,
>   		sess_conf.userdata = (void *) sa;
>   
>   		ips->security.ses = rte_security_session_create(sec_ctx,
> -					&sess_conf, skt_ctx->session_pool);
> +					&sess_conf, skt_ctx->session_pool,
> +					skt_ctx->session_priv_pool);
>   		if (ips->security.ses == NULL) {
>   			RTE_LOG(ERR, IPSEC,
>   				"SEC Session init failed: err: %d\n", ret);
> diff --git a/lib/librte_security/rte_security.c b/lib/librte_security/rte_security.c
> index 515c29e04..ee4666026 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_security/rte_security.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_security/rte_security.c
> @@ -26,18 +26,21 @@
>   struct rte_security_session *
>   rte_security_session_create(struct rte_security_ctx *instance,
>   			    struct rte_security_session_conf *conf,
> -			    struct rte_mempool *mp)
> +			    struct rte_mempool *mp,
> +			    struct rte_mempool *priv_mp)
>   {
>   	struct rte_security_session *sess = NULL;
>   
>   	RTE_PTR_CHAIN3_OR_ERR_RET(instance, ops, session_create, NULL, NULL);
>   	RTE_PTR_OR_ERR_RET(conf, NULL);
>   	RTE_PTR_OR_ERR_RET(mp, NULL);
> +	RTE_PTR_OR_ERR_RET(priv_mp, NULL);
>   
>   	if (rte_mempool_get(mp, (void **)&sess))
>   		return NULL;
>   
> -	if (instance->ops->session_create(instance->device, conf, sess, mp)) {
> +	if (instance->ops->session_create(instance->device, conf,
> +				sess, priv_mp)) {
>   		rte_mempool_put(mp, (void *)sess);
>   		return NULL;
>   	}
> diff --git a/lib/librte_security/rte_security.h b/lib/librte_security/rte_security.h
> index 16839e539..1710cdd6a 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_security/rte_security.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_security/rte_security.h
> @@ -386,6 +386,7 @@ struct rte_security_session {
>    * @param   instance	security instance
>    * @param   conf	session configuration parameters
>    * @param   mp		mempool to allocate session objects from
> + * @param   priv_mp	mempool to allocate session private data objects from
>    * @return
>    *  - On success, pointer to session
>    *  - On failure, NULL
> @@ -393,7 +394,8 @@ struct rte_security_session {
>   struct rte_security_session *
>   rte_security_session_create(struct rte_security_ctx *instance,
>   			    struct rte_security_session_conf *conf,
> -			    struct rte_mempool *mp);
> +			    struct rte_mempool *mp,
> +			    struct rte_mempool *priv_mp);
>   
>   /**
>    * Update security session as specified by the session configuration

Best regards

Lukasz

-- 
Lukasz Wojciechowski
Principal Software Engineer

Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
Office +48 22 377 88 25
l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com