From: "Mattias Rönnblom" <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com>
To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
dev@dpdk.org, tiwei.bie@intel.com, jfreimann@redhat.com,
zhihong.wang@intel.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com,
konstantin.ananyev@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/5] vhost: do not inline unlikely fragmented buffers code
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 21:43:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2cfed6b0-8a7d-ec05-4b67-f40bd9409a8b@ericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190517122220.31283-4-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
On 2019-05-17 14:22, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> Handling of fragmented virtio-net header and indirect descriptors
> tables was implemented to fix CVE-2018-1059. It should not never
> happen with healthy guests and so are already considered as
> unlikely code path.
>
> This patch moves these bits into non-inline dedicated functions
> to reduce the I-cache pressure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_vhost/vhost.c | 33 +++++++++++
> lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h | 35 +-----------
> lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c | 102 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 3 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.c b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.c
> index 4a54ad6bd1..8a4379bc13 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.c
> @@ -201,6 +201,39 @@ __vhost_log_cache_write(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> }
>
>
> +void *
> +alloc_copy_ind_table(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
This function should have a prefix.
> + uint64_t desc_addr, uint64_t desc_len)
> +{
> + void *idesc;
> + uint64_t src, dst;
> + uint64_t len, remain = desc_len;
> +
> + idesc = rte_malloc(__func__, desc_len, 0);
> + if (unlikely(!idesc))
if (idesc == NULL)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + dst = (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)idesc;
> +
> + while (remain) {
remain > 0
> + len = remain;
> + src = vhost_iova_to_vva(dev, vq, desc_addr, &len,
> + VHOST_ACCESS_RO);
> + if (unlikely(!src || !len)) {
> + rte_free(idesc);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + rte_memcpy((void *)(uintptr_t)dst, (void *)(uintptr_t)src, len);
Just for my understanding: what difference does that (uintptr_t) cast do?
> +
> + remain -= len;
> + dst += len;
> + desc_addr += len;
> + }
> +
> + return idesc;
> +}
> +
> void
> cleanup_vq(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, int destroy)
> {
> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h
> index 3ab7b4950f..ab26454e1c 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h
> @@ -488,6 +488,8 @@ void vhost_backend_cleanup(struct virtio_net *dev);
>
> uint64_t __vhost_iova_to_vva(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> uint64_t iova, uint64_t *len, uint8_t perm);
> +void *alloc_copy_ind_table(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> + uint64_t desc_addr, uint64_t desc_len);
> int vring_translate(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq);
> void vring_invalidate(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq);
>
> @@ -601,39 +603,6 @@ vhost_vring_call_packed(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
> eventfd_write(vq->callfd, (eventfd_t)1);
> }
>
> -static __rte_always_inline void *
> -alloc_copy_ind_table(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> - uint64_t desc_addr, uint64_t desc_len)
> -{
> - void *idesc;
> - uint64_t src, dst;
> - uint64_t len, remain = desc_len;
> -
> - idesc = rte_malloc(__func__, desc_len, 0);
> - if (unlikely(!idesc))
> - return 0;
> -
> - dst = (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)idesc;
> -
> - while (remain) {
> - len = remain;
> - src = vhost_iova_to_vva(dev, vq, desc_addr, &len,
> - VHOST_ACCESS_RO);
> - if (unlikely(!src || !len)) {
> - rte_free(idesc);
> - return 0;
> - }
> -
> - rte_memcpy((void *)(uintptr_t)dst, (void *)(uintptr_t)src, len);
> -
> - remain -= len;
> - dst += len;
> - desc_addr += len;
> - }
> -
> - return idesc;
> -}
> -
> static __rte_always_inline void
> free_ind_table(void *idesc)
> {
> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c b/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
> index 35ae4992c2..494dd9957e 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
> @@ -610,6 +610,35 @@ reserve_avail_buf_packed(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void
> +copy_vnet_hdr_to_desc(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
__rte_noinline? Or you don't care about this function being inlined or not?
> + struct buf_vector *buf_vec,
> + struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf *hdr){
> + uint64_t len;
> + uint64_t remain = dev->vhost_hlen;
> + uint64_t src = (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)hdr, dst;
> + uint64_t iova = buf_vec->buf_iova;
> +
> + while (remain) {
remain > 0
> + len = RTE_MIN(remain,
> + buf_vec->buf_len);
> + dst = buf_vec->buf_addr;
> + rte_memcpy((void *)(uintptr_t)dst,
> + (void *)(uintptr_t)src,
> + len);
> +
> + PRINT_PACKET(dev, (uintptr_t)dst,
> + (uint32_t)len, 0);
> + vhost_log_cache_write(dev, vq,
> + iova, len);
> +
> + remain -= len;
> + iova += len;
> + src += len;
> + buf_vec++;
> + }
> +}
> +
> static __rte_always_inline int
> copy_mbuf_to_desc(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> struct rte_mbuf *m, struct buf_vector *buf_vec,
> @@ -703,30 +732,7 @@ copy_mbuf_to_desc(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> num_buffers);
>
> if (unlikely(hdr == &tmp_hdr)) {
> - uint64_t len;
> - uint64_t remain = dev->vhost_hlen;
> - uint64_t src = (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)hdr, dst;
> - uint64_t iova = buf_vec[0].buf_iova;
> - uint16_t hdr_vec_idx = 0;
> -
> - while (remain) {
> - len = RTE_MIN(remain,
> - buf_vec[hdr_vec_idx].buf_len);
> - dst = buf_vec[hdr_vec_idx].buf_addr;
> - rte_memcpy((void *)(uintptr_t)dst,
> - (void *)(uintptr_t)src,
> - len);
> -
> - PRINT_PACKET(dev, (uintptr_t)dst,
> - (uint32_t)len, 0);
> - vhost_log_cache_write(dev, vq,
> - iova, len);
> -
> - remain -= len;
> - iova += len;
> - src += len;
> - hdr_vec_idx++;
> - }
> + copy_vnet_hdr_to_desc(dev, vq, buf_vec, hdr);
> } else {
> PRINT_PACKET(dev, (uintptr_t)hdr_addr,
> dev->vhost_hlen, 0);
> @@ -1063,6 +1069,31 @@ vhost_dequeue_offload(struct virtio_net_hdr *hdr, struct rte_mbuf *m)
> }
> }
>
> +static void
> +copy_vnet_hdr_from_desc(struct virtio_net_hdr *hdr,
> + struct buf_vector *buf_vec)
__rte_noinline?
> +{
> + uint64_t len;
> + uint64_t remain = sizeof(struct virtio_net_hdr);
> + uint64_t src;
> + uint64_t dst = (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)&hdr;
> +
> + /*
> + * No luck, the virtio-net header doesn't fit
> + * in a contiguous virtual area.
> + */
> + while (remain) {
> + len = RTE_MIN(remain, buf_vec->buf_len);
> + src = buf_vec->buf_addr;
> + rte_memcpy((void *)(uintptr_t)dst,
> + (void *)(uintptr_t)src, len);
> +
> + remain -= len;
> + dst += len;
> + buf_vec++;
> + }
> +}
> +
> static __rte_always_inline int
> copy_desc_to_mbuf(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> struct buf_vector *buf_vec, uint16_t nr_vec,
> @@ -1094,28 +1125,7 @@ copy_desc_to_mbuf(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>
> if (virtio_net_with_host_offload(dev)) {
> if (unlikely(buf_len < sizeof(struct virtio_net_hdr))) {
> - uint64_t len;
> - uint64_t remain = sizeof(struct virtio_net_hdr);
> - uint64_t src;
> - uint64_t dst = (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)&tmp_hdr;
> - uint16_t hdr_vec_idx = 0;
> -
> - /*
> - * No luck, the virtio-net header doesn't fit
> - * in a contiguous virtual area.
> - */
> - while (remain) {
> - len = RTE_MIN(remain,
> - buf_vec[hdr_vec_idx].buf_len);
> - src = buf_vec[hdr_vec_idx].buf_addr;
> - rte_memcpy((void *)(uintptr_t)dst,
> - (void *)(uintptr_t)src, len);
> -
> - remain -= len;
> - dst += len;
> - hdr_vec_idx++;
> - }
> -
> + copy_vnet_hdr_from_desc(&tmp_hdr, buf_vec);
> hdr = &tmp_hdr;
> } else {
> hdr = (struct virtio_net_hdr *)((uintptr_t)buf_addr);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-21 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-17 12:22 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] vhost: I-cache pressure optimizations Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-17 12:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/5] vhost: un-inline dirty pages logging functions Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-17 12:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/5] vhost: do not inline packed and split functions Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-17 13:00 ` David Marchand
2019-05-17 14:42 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-17 12:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/5] vhost: do not inline unlikely fragmented buffers code Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-17 12:57 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-21 19:43 ` Mattias Rönnblom [this message]
2019-05-23 14:30 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-23 15:17 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2019-05-23 17:40 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-17 12:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/5] vhost: simplify descriptor's buffer prefetching Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-17 12:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/5] eal/x86: force inlining of all memcpy and mov helpers Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-17 13:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] vhost: I-cache pressure optimizations David Marchand
2019-05-17 14:42 ` Maxime Coquelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2cfed6b0-8a7d-ec05-4b67-f40bd9409a8b@ericsson.com \
--to=mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jfreimann@redhat.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
--cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).