From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC7CAD84 for ; Tue, 10 May 2016 18:12:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 May 2016 09:12:25 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,604,1455004800"; d="scan'208,217";a="976754455" Received: from smonroyx-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.58]) ([10.237.220.58]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 May 2016 09:12:24 -0700 From: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy To: Mahdi Moradmand Badie Cc: dev@dpdk.org References: <6cbfe6bd-b4c4-c0c8-3969-9d362193d8b3@intel.com> Message-ID: <2de4ef85-cdd0-9cd8-f1ff-20f81930a258@intel.com> Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 17:12:23 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] rte_malloc X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 16:12:28 -0000 Have you tried to run the unit tests? (Run 'app/test' application, then 'malloc_autotest') Sergio On 10/05/2016 16:55, Mahdi Moradmand Badie wrote: > #!/bin/sh > ./build/app/Mahdi_test -c 0x55 --master-lcore 0 > > On 10 May 2016 at 11:31, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy > > wrote: > > Forgot to ask, > > What's the command line you are using to run the app? > > Sergio > > > On 10/05/2016 16:17, Mahdi Moradmand Badie wrote: >> Thanks Sergio, >> Yes sure, >> I attached files, it seems so easy but doesn't work. >> Thanks, >> >> On 10 May 2016 at 04:12, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy >> > > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On 09/05/2016 18:32, Mahdi Moradmand Badie wrote: >> >> Hello All, >> >> I had a problem regarding use the rte_malloc. >> I want to know if I want to use rte_malloc instead of >> malloc just mak >> change like this >> struct lcore_params *p = malloc >> >> (sizeof(*p)); ==> >> struct lcore_params *p = rte_malloc >> (NULL, >> sizeof(*p), 0); >> is enough ? >> >> >> Yes, malloc(sizeof(*p)) has an equivalent behavior to >> rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(*p), 0) >> in the context of a DPDK application. >> >> Because I have problem and Segmentation fault (core >> dumped) ?? >> >> >> Could you provide more details of how to reproduce or could >> you try to >> reproduce your problem using a very simple example like >> examples/helloworld ? >> >> Sergio >> >> Thanks in advance, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> M@hdi Mor@dm@nd B@die > > > > > -- > M@hdi Mor@dm@nd B@die