From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, i.maximets@samsung.com, tiwei.bie@intel.com,
zhihong.wang@intel.com, jasowang@redhat.com, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] vhost: enforce avail index and desc read ordering
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 16:50:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2dfb7495-7922-d3ad-bef9-7c48065e7396@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181219104410-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On 12/19/18 4:47 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 09:21:10AM +0100, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>> A read barrier is required to ensure the ordering between
>> available index and the descriptor reads is enforced.
>>
>> 1. read avail_head = avail->idx
>> 2. read cur_idx = last_avail_idx
>> if (cur_idx != avail_head) {
>> 3. read idx = avail->ring[cur_idx]
>> 4. read desc[idx]
>> }
>>
>> There is a control dependency between step 1 and steps 3 & 4,
>> 3 could be speculatively executed before 1, which could result
>> in 'idx' to not being updated yet.
>>
>> Fixes: 4796ad63ba1f ("examples/vhost: import userspace vhost application")
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>
>> Reported-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
>> Acked-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@samsung.com>
>
> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>
> BTW Ilya do you see a performance degradation from RMBs with these patches?
>
>
>> ---
>> lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c b/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
>> index 8c657a101..7f37bbbed 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
>> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
>> @@ -752,6 +752,12 @@ virtio_dev_rx_split(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>> rte_prefetch0(&vq->avail->ring[vq->last_avail_idx & (vq->size - 1)]);
>> avail_head = *((volatile uint16_t *)&vq->avail->idx);
>>
>> + /*
>> + * The ordering between avail index and
>> + * desc reads needs to be enforced.
>> + */
>> + rte_smp_rmb();
>> +
>
> I'd guess you want to put the RMB before the prefetch. No?
> Otherwise I think you are either stalling until that completes
> or discard the prefetch ...
Yeah, this is actually done in patch 3.
Thanks,
Maxime
>> for (pkt_idx = 0; pkt_idx < count; pkt_idx++) {
>> uint32_t pkt_len = pkts[pkt_idx]->pkt_len + dev->vhost_hlen;
>> uint16_t nr_vec = 0;
>> @@ -1334,6 +1340,12 @@ virtio_dev_tx_split(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>> if (free_entries == 0)
>> return 0;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * The ordering between avail index and
>> + * desc reads needs to be enforced.
>> + */
>> + rte_smp_rmb();
>> +
>> VHOST_LOG_DEBUG(VHOST_DATA, "(%d) %s\n", dev->vid, __func__);
>>
>> count = RTE_MIN(count, MAX_PKT_BURST);
>> --
>> 2.17.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-19 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-19 8:21 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] vhost: add missing barriers, move prefetching Maxime Coquelin
2018-12-19 8:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] vhost: enforce avail index and desc read ordering Maxime Coquelin
2018-12-19 15:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-12-19 15:50 ` Maxime Coquelin [this message]
2018-12-19 8:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] vhost: enforce desc flags and content " Maxime Coquelin
2018-12-19 8:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] vhost: prefetch descriptor after the read barrier Maxime Coquelin
2018-12-19 8:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] vhost: remove useless prefetch for packed ring descriptor Maxime Coquelin
2018-12-19 15:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-12-19 15:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] vhost: add missing barriers, move prefetching Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-12-19 16:28 ` Ilya Maximets
2018-12-20 4:39 ` Tiwei Bie
2018-12-20 18:19 ` Maxime Coquelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2dfb7495-7922-d3ad-bef9-7c48065e7396@redhat.com \
--to=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=i.maximets@samsung.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
--cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).