From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mproxygzt1.163.com (mproxygzt1.163.com [113.108.225.5]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9CBD2C18 for ; Tue, 8 Aug 2017 09:27:08 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=126.com; s=s110527; h=From:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version; bh=iyrsK ZfhJtPa7hQMtGlZ1lXHxkohTDna21CjDUhDHOY=; b=gNKJz9DcUUP6TauLjpYdj YTb2z6LQ3jm8dDw143y7IGHUizzqAp+kRpdqklbLnMOMOUawq3Yy7HyfRGr2vslp ZfokNSJHQSMTzo98Sish6LQiZnVtoH7UrVSJjR/SU6s+ykfmXhZYtIG0o+qHoXqk SGoEluKhiyJMyG8XsE8xe4= Received: from [10.24.0.238] (unknown [202.189.3.162]) by smtp4 (Coremail) with SMTP id jdKowAA3hdqbZ4lZijdjBg--.3871S2; Tue, 08 Aug 2017 15:26:20 +0800 (CST) To: dev@dpdk.org From: Furong Message-ID: <2f4bdab7-9873-e293-26fd-36ef5f2d80a1@126.com> Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 15:26:18 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gbk; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CM-TRANSID: jdKowAA3hdqbZ4lZijdjBg--.3871S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjDUn29KB7ZKAUJUUUUU529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7v73 VFW2AGmfu7bjvjm3AaLaJ3UbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjxUgQtxDUUUU X-Originating-IP: [202.189.3.162] X-CM-SenderInfo: xzedxtxfhuqiyswou0bp/1tbi1BwuMFYFM4zimQAAsB Subject: [dpdk-dev] Why IVSHMEM was removed since 16.11 ? X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2017 07:27:11 -0000 The release notes of dpdk-16.11 had shown that IVSHMEM was removed due to some design issues. So, what are these issues? Thanks!