From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A071AA0A03; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 15:25:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79BE0140E34; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 15:25:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F39A140E33 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 15:25:00 +0100 (CET) IronPort-SDR: IWMu7lA/14SBwMfFzFiII6AMZITvrPZ88/orqLPekMfSWH/29KmmFQ21BIMMa0BsR1oJfp/v6d TV6/WG6k6g7A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9867"; a="157989384" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,356,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="157989384" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Jan 2021 06:24:58 -0800 IronPort-SDR: SkUT8PZGRmMME9/4Dvb+q5luuZPtYM07LT/3ZGoqFsOdIybQZHwOrMQmYdLvqJ2b0DfkE35svv R1/jh+DGHddw== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,356,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="383589532" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.213.241.24]) ([10.213.241.24]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Jan 2021 06:24:55 -0800 To: "Rong, Leyi" , Odi Assli , "Zhang, Qi Z" , "Lu, Wenzhuo" , "Richardson, Bruce" , "Xing, Beilei" , "Kadam, Pallavi" , "Menon, Ranjit" Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , Tal Shnaiderman , NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon , Raslan Darawsheh , Ali Alnubani References: <20201215021945.103396-1-leyi.rong@intel.com> <20210114063951.2580-1-leyi.rong@intel.com> From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: <2f4e5455-2c11-9f90-fc8e-ac5d1601536e@intel.com> Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 14:24:51 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] AVX512 vPMD on i40e X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 1/18/2021 1:58 PM, Rong, Leyi wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Odi Assli >> Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2021 7:26 PM >> To: Zhang, Qi Z ; Rong, Leyi ; Lu, >> Wenzhuo ; Yigit, Ferruh ; >> Richardson, Bruce ; Xing, Beilei >> ; Kadam, Pallavi ; Menon, >> Ranjit >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Tal Shnaiderman ; NBU-Contact- >> Thomas Monjalon ; Raslan Darawsheh >> ; Ali Alnubani >> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 0/3] AVX512 vPMD on i40e >> >>>> Subject: [PATCH v3 0/3] AVX512 vPMD on i40e >>>> >>>> This patchset aims to support AVX512 vPMD on i40e. >>>> And the changes are only target to AVX512 vector path. >>>> >>>> --- >>>> v3: >>>> - Extract get_avx_supported() to get the proper vector data path to >>> choose. >>>> >>>> v2: >>>> - Add return value check on rte_mempool_default_cache(). >>>> >>>> >>>> Leyi Rong (3): >>>> net/i40e: remove devarg use-latest-supported-vec >>>> net/i40e: add AVX512 vector path >>>> net/i40e: optimize Tx by using AVX512 >>>> >>>> doc/guides/nics/i40e.rst | 9 - >>>> drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 63 +- >>>> drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h | 3 - >>>> drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c | 196 ++-- >>>> drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h | 13 + >>>> drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_avx512.c | 1136 >>> +++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> drivers/net/i40e/meson.build | 24 + >>>> 7 files changed, 1301 insertions(+), 143 deletions(-) create mode >>>> 100644 drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_avx512.c >>>> >>>> -- >>>> 2.17.1 >>> >>> >>> Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel after revert v1. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Qi >> >> Hi, >> This patch series broke i40e compilation on windows with failure in undefined >> __m_prefetchw function Please see details in bug: 619 [1]. >> >> [1]: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=619 >> > > Hi Ferruh, > > Could you help to squash my fix patch into the patch series? As I've verified it works locally. > > Hi Assli, > > Could you help to check after Ferruh squashed the fix patch into the next-net? > Hi Assli, The other-way around is safer perhaps, can you please test with the patch: https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/86804/ If it is good, I can squash it in the next-net. Thanks, ferruh