From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DAA3A04DB; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 01:03:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 123D21D9CE; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 01:03:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75EE41C1F8 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 01:02:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FB545C0182; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 19:02:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 14 Oct 2020 19:02:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= DyJsbhKt3XWHXEYpzmeKiiDBrtqLFF152366GllhJjc=; b=C1+PhFW+PfUyIVqb ptV2M2JrJNSU74M6IFsp5edtZtSDUu3n1uO8rM9mQA0MjNhIaYUTde9M9Mjne5R5 yp+clTBosMRfwbcSeJHBstU/essaxScSvAkwbbraWyUzfsTneHz9JH5WMvRdbA3G QgWXsrzSnoer5xB+p+h7tIa2nMbVlYpH9NJUIGDljXZJn3h8TfB3O9oFbDxyhV2V zDCUWd05TyF1p+YAjfH4bIVtloNH/HBDS3f7iizMJhqhpknhbmrv8gV264eG+EKu xeO/5rQbIkSw75OrbW7EaV4oR1LusYpRqfyMWCPaO1rvJW6Hz0gHkMzcpTG0O1qB Ut9hqw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=DyJsbhKt3XWHXEYpzmeKiiDBrtqLFF152366GllhJ jc=; b=VPcMQ99HIAGEtmd5nmm5aRjB4dFGcxF8CLWvnwKYhTHK+nEkJWQ7xixWe zaVhWjTD4bx2YS911/OKdCfXHfmZ26rXVKfdKxGLziPtj/GJ/1iqT2132shHpAPt 7xW99MVUdkqfGb/FXm80jMgpYBEXvZ5hSmCygqpy6iN2PpRcUAACyHc4HEmvpbHC gj3y/qL/E4h5i5mOZgw692EERHfoZX/v/6uXxtdobnn6zO5PX/UqUne1nAeSWPBa UoNUqobZXylLQ45yS+clg+98fAZwL67PTjO/i3z2Kw/rfD+q2lXaht+GRyCyJvI0 kJnqqnULcJqBRT7c5xEV45AZ3FjTw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedriedvgddujecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdejueei iedvffegheenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhho nhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DC414328005E; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 19:02:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: "Burakov, Anatoly" , dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 01:02:52 +0200 Message-ID: <3008158.7fZqm1lKDC@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20200914094058.16b715d5@hermes.lan> References: <20200904221143.19744-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <6a912a3a-81c2-7740-5f89-815d2e5fba5d@intel.com> <20200914094058.16b715d5@hermes.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/rte_malloc: add alloc_size() attribute to allocation functions X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 14/09/2020 18:40, Stephen Hemminger: > On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 16:35:58 +0100 > "Burakov, Anatoly" wrote: > > > > * Replacement function for calloc(), using huge-page memory. Memory area is > > > @@ -239,9 +243,9 @@ rte_zmalloc_socket(const char *type, size_t size, unsigned align, int socket); > > > * align is not a power of two). > > > * - Otherwise, the pointer to the allocated object. > > > */ > > > -__rte_malloc > > > void * > > > > Where did this come from? > > It was on an earlier patch, I based this on an abandoned tree, will rebase on main. Will you send a new version?