From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8116C427F6; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 20:43:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104D64021D; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 20:43:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D604740156 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 20:43:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0402732007D7; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 14:43:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 28 Mar 2023 14:43:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t= 1680028984; x=1680115384; bh=40cT/+W0GN+R9rcE2c4IrOwzUdEc7i+OjuJ bpSHNNP4=; b=yXjLNVJvSAB/XNyinxhVU4AWAH2f1EILtQIUDy01r1uGQ3jhXCo pQT7foXiEncYvza9OIwcceYrx1Y/gWF+/IBWZW65uIk2k3Xz198YiJiREArolc9Y PZO1uZHa2tB2uwVyUihmafbLhNFu/8Jj93rjZjMhiwcmFJv8llqR5jpXaoej83aO XqL7w7bXya+f96rsRtJgqvJoqmc+tBsLv+4PETz+vXAQTB28vwgxLNxwkNUWnIPX VW3VpaTUjo8K3RjndGrq6R/m/EL8oSXABS8oDXq9vnDp8QfSAKR44LIe+9Ac2irb gx2aD+PWV3PzC3kcPYNnV/7IjzJPwCAe2Yg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1680028984; x=1680115384; bh=40cT/+W0GN+R9rcE2c4IrOwzUdEc7i+OjuJ bpSHNNP4=; b=s+dl7bAjMXoed7aomw4ijwqiUfZVuRhocrl7gKgqcDNCMk8ANZu FNXZM/gAvBQhKpsRh0qX2lsSQfxToEtpO/rt2abmA2Fop+tWKAZMvNTybqVDD5bY mO536HgHAfbvrDZFPqLApaKeMEwrgIfVTbVFh2VYpU/llQp3sKhDs/veor61a0ED 9R6aWswjWKnBraJxiJgLHfX9hlAzhh4V2yWttnMyy7Vc1qwg7r6cEPEI/wd+Ff4P u5+I+pHHQdggNYruIm/qAgUqfQBVuGNcIUoeKf6K2UBHgcnX0PoFxbsSo7UKZtlm 7BvCg39V0XOoXv0zTP+NJvTZT+M1KhTDbQg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrvdehgedguddvkecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvfevufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhho mhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqne cuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepvdegleeggeekffdttdeuuedtteeuvdejkefhleeuleegfefh kefhheevgfekgfeinecuffhomhgrihhnpehlfihnrdhnvghtpdhkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrgh enucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhho mhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 14:43:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Raslan Darawsheh Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Andrew Rybchenko , "jerinj@marvell.com" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "ferruh.yigit@intel.com" , "Gal Cohen (ProdM)" , Ajit Khaparde Subject: Re: [PATCH] devtools: add E-Switch keyword for commit checks Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 20:43:01 +0200 Message-ID: <3028651.ktpJ11cQ8Q@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20220224092623.26180-1-rasland@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 24/02/2022 20:20, Ajit Khaparde: > On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 3:07 AM Raslan Darawsheh wrote: > > > > ++ adding more people here, > > > > From: Thomas Monjalon > > > 24/02/2022 10:26, Raslan Darawsheh: > > > > This adds the syntax for E-Switch to have check on how it suppose to > > > > be for commits > > > [...] > > > > +E-Switch > > > > > > It looks Mellanox people use this syntax in Linux kernel as well. > > > Where does it come from? Is it a Mellanox-only wording? > > I think it was coined around the time when Mellanox submitted the > kernel driver patchset in 2015. > https://lwn.net/Articles/666180/ > > I think it has become a fairly used term since that time. > > > > > > I don't think it's a Mellanox only wording see the following: > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/networking/devlink/devlink-port.html?#devlink-port > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/networking/switchdev.html > > > > > Intuitively, I would have written it eSwitch generally. > > I would go with E-Switch > > > It means "embedded switch", right? > > In kernel, it's Ethernet Switch device. > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/networking/switchdev.html Forgotten and Applied (very late), thanks.