From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B574234 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 12:05:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Sep 2015 03:05:51 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,607,1437462000"; d="scan'208";a="815338972" Received: from irsmsx104.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.159]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Sep 2015 03:05:45 -0700 Received: from irsmsx111.ger.corp.intel.com (10.108.20.4) by IRSMSX104.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.3.159) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:04:15 +0100 Received: from irsmsx102.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.84]) by irsmsx111.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.89]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:04:15 +0100 From: "Kulasek, TomaszX" To: Tetsuya Mukawa , "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv4 4/9] null: virtual dynamic rss configuration Thread-Index: AQHQ+l4LjjvYG1tPxkKqhKSuSSqF6J5TRpIw Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 10:04:14 +0000 Message-ID: <3042915272161B4EB253DA4D77EB373A14DF7A7F@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1435589444-1988-1-git-send-email-tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com> <1436981189-3320-1-git-send-email-tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com> <1436981189-3320-5-git-send-email-tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com> <5609F673.80405@igel.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <5609F673.80405@igel.co.jp> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.181] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv4 4/9] null: virtual dynamic rss configuration X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 10:05:52 -0000 > Hi Thomasz, >=20 > I am just curious. Is it possible to use rte_memcpy instead of memcpy? > if we can, rte_memcpy may be faster. >=20 > Tetsuya Hi Tetsuya, I've just tested it and seems to work, so there's no objections to use rte_= memcpy. Tomasz.