From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ABEAA058A; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:55:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90D661E8C4; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:55:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9001DCBE for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:55:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 168635C0120; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 09:55:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 17 Apr 2020 09:55:15 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=fVtydhnQ1CW+NWPLEGDyyTr6yWxuN/KtiBgbrbKPi+U=; b=VEHhXWxiX/VG YB+5PRFVZQKgWX5uitdIAthHEiayTA38P/T7mRJXeRw1BT3JEihBTC1v3zkwWBMI 4aR9s/5bM2D8b3cj33RNErw9H6jCgWRazT5+DgrClTUV4Sku0x06nq7+z5es16zf R84+4phVsmAlqy5RiptDKQk1Qfticnk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=fVtydhnQ1CW+NWPLEGDyyTr6yWxuN/KtiBgbrbKPi +U=; b=CPfPQMJ4NryXS4rcSHld9v0sN2TWcnss1esWLeH0blYl6175cTJhQTF2F KITjw0VdgJtO+S8GXJTO3wIvkXG9MebaBr3pWAQGrZv/GTVaOf9Td0PkCnr142/a BTrJoxCy8kQ0wjB9E7bTeSi8erXJoO4zXMUoH6VvQhikhukB5DhMZXCe9Xt7xihR bklOu8vYpaDgg3gddG4dNpHb6Qwv6eZagvmu/cUaDg7K6hTV6Il5jAlQjY0LSCiZ YBuZ1Us53ZIZZy6WNcZtYjjb8kv9tBiksbsfqXSV5/tyyU+5ZuwKWWfn7UUdOvcF 2ag2E9qR4bDFVAxXf1z/IcNAzVGgg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrfeejgdejtdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucfkph epjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghr rghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5CD0D328006A; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 09:55:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Trahe, Fiona" Cc: David Marchand , dev , Jerin Jacob , Pavan Nikhilesh , "Richardson, Bruce" , "Yigit, Ferruh" , Hemant Agrawal Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:54:12 +0200 Message-ID: <3060691.oqx4rD5t72@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20200402183253.866-1-jerinjacobk@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] build: disable experimental API check internally X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 17/04/2020 15:44, Trahe, Fiona: > From: David Marchand > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 12:21 PM Trahe, Fiona wrote: > > > I see this is already applied. > > > > > > However, > > > rte_cryptodev_queue_pair_setup() calls > > > rte_cryptodev_sym_get_existing_header_session_size() > > > The former is a stable API, the latter is experimental. > > > So I expect the build to break when ALLOW_EXPERIMENTAL_API is disabled. > [Fiona] Thanks for confirming where the flag is. > But I think you've missed my point. > What about this problem? > How was this tested with the flag disabled? We are not supposed to disable the flag internally. The examples are not affected by the global enablement, so you can test non-experimental build with examples.