From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (mail-wi0-f173.google.com [209.85.212.173]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4616C6F0 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 17:32:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wibud3 with SMTP id ud3so36790504wib.0 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 08:32:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=/k6PvEoCVdSIPlApsjwV7r87bmQwuHqgygZ3XdNtBus=; b=LVXkMqYezYehTmFeyOTuXf/OcpogUNwgv6CVb6zzGOsNXnjZnbWqRVHo5VJEy9jvFE fc1Cfl7NfHrmA0So4I2D+fgVtNIID1kl0ooSKTdLpAx9ngB7Vy6vkM7Fqf72od6ADaen vrOgP7sbbapYRvJzqEQfgRVqSB+l19wqNnkhSCv18lkSc1NY+2SJAX5UJOxKjOHWDZQM XYa1dgGIfb88Y1nZQ24/WSwzKfPUDtD4bG62p7u+5A+xZmEKYdQuUSYjr2lQExX5/tBr RdKKJ0F6v12ICgRJ0gTxD3eacwaguzpIrYo/V7TRzVwCAhFq+ehdc/BmWHtSwuKBo65y xtHA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQktKgjWajDSarBjrhy0QnGALAJ7CM58cox3u18nuafam3P8gKojEpqWI5M02FNEhgjp8rge X-Received: by 10.194.221.4 with SMTP id qa4mr7206827wjc.145.1438356741740; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 08:32:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i6sm7697147wje.33.2015.07.31.08.32.20 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 31 Jul 2015 08:32:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Zhang, Helin" Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 17:31:05 +0200 Message-ID: <3062043.oWgikOttml@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.8 (Linux/4.0.4-2-ARCH; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <2490473.jjJga3lrlm@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] config files maintenance X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 15:32:22 -0000 2015-07-31 15:29, Zhang, Helin: > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > > Can we remove i40e bulk alloc option? > > As the receiving functions are different for bulk_alloc or not, we need this flag. What brings the non bulk alloc function? Why is it disabled for BSD?