Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 7/7]app/testpmd: add commands and config functions for i40e flow director support

[Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>]

2014-08-28 11:30, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> From: Thomas Monjalon
> > 2014-08-28 09:01, Wu, Jingjing:
> > > I have another question:
> > > If we use the way 'rx_classification_filter_ctl' works, the specific
> > > structures defined in rte_i40e.h will be visible in user's application,
> > > such as testpmd.
> > > I know I shouldn't make commands linked with i40e like what I did before.
> > > But will the i40e specific structures become visible be acceptable?
> > 
> > I think testpmd should be limited to generic API.
> > So it wouldn't be acceptable to be dependent of i40e files.
> > But having some specific i40e tests in examples or app/test is OK.
> > 
> 
> Probably I didn't get you right:

Indeed ;)

> Are you suggesting to have a new clone of testpmd for any new device
> we are going to support?

No. I say there shouldn't be any PMD dependency on testpmd.
It means we should use only generic API.

> That seems like too much hassle to me.
> Plus what to do if someone would like to test configuration with two
> different devices involved: ixgbe and i40e for example?

ixgbe and i40e features should use the same generic API for flow director.

> I suggest we keep one testpmd for all devices we support.
> Of course we'll probably have to make some rework to avoid
> if (strncmp(drv_name, "xxx") spread all over it.
> We need to find some better way to discover/setup HW specific features.

Agreed
-- 
Thomas